-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make Vec::new
a const fn
#50233
Make Vec::new
a const fn
#50233
Conversation
r? @kennytm (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
src/liballoc/vec.rs
Outdated
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ impl<T> Vec<T> { | |||
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")] | |||
pub fn new() -> Vec<T> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You forgot the actual change of this PR 😆
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh. 🤦♂️ Thanks!
src/liballoc/vec.rs
Outdated
@@ -322,9 +322,9 @@ impl<T> Vec<T> { | |||
/// ``` | |||
#[inline] | |||
#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")] | |||
pub fn new() -> Vec<T> { | |||
pub const fn new() -> Vec<T> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please mark this with #[rustc_const_unstable(feature = "const_vec_new")]
so we don't need to insta-stable this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kennytm Done.
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
The test needs |
This changes the behavior for zero-sized types. Before this change, If we want to preserve the current optimization for zero-sized types, then instead of getting rid of the |
|
@alexreg would it be possible to get an ETA on that? What does "very soon" mean exactly? If it will be in the next few weeks or so, then I think it would be worth it to wait for that. Otherwise, we could use the |
@mbrubeck That approach doesn't quite work:
|
If you don't use an intermediate const, then the trick should work. Const if is still ways off. So use the array trick |
Still. the trick works now. No need to block this PR |
Yeah, I don't dispute that. ;-) |
Hmm... tidy is segfaulting on my machine, so I can't run tests at the moment... |
The job Click to expand the log.
I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
Oh 🤦♂️ |
@kennytm I think this is ready for another review |
@bors r+ |
📌 Commit f9f9923 has been approved by |
Make `Vec::new` a `const fn` `RawVec::empty/_in` are a hack. They're there because `if size_of::<T> == 0 { !0 } else { 0 }` is not allowed in `const` yet. However, because `RawVec` is unstable, the `empty/empty_in` constructors can be removed when rust-lang#49146 is done...
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #50233 (Make `Vec::new` a `const fn`) - #50312 (Add more links in panic docs) - #50316 (Fix some broken links in docs.) - #50325 (Add a few more tests for proc macro feature gating) - #50327 (Display correct unused field suggestion for nested struct patterns) - #50330 (check that #[used] is used only on statics) - #50344 (Update Cargo to 2018-04-28 122fd5be5201913d42e219e132d6569493583bca) Failed merges:
impl String {
pub fn new() -> String {
String { vec: Vec::new() }
}
} Given that |
Good idea! |
Make `String::new()` const Following the steps of rust-lang#50233 , make `String::new()` a `const fn`.
Initially, rust-lang#50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
Test capacity of ZST vector Initially, rust-lang#50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
Test capacity of ZST vector Initially, rust-lang#50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
Test capacity of ZST vector Initially, rust-lang#50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
Test capacity of ZST vector Initially, rust-lang#50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
Test capacity of ZST vector Initially, rust-lang#50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
Test capacity of ZST vector Initially, rust-lang#50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
Test capacity of ZST vector Initially, rust-lang#50233 accidentally changed the capacity of empty ZST. This was pointed out during code review. This commit adds a test to prevent capacity of ZST vectors from accidentally changing to prevent that from happening again.
RawVec::empty/_in
are a hack. They're there becauseif size_of::<T> == 0 { !0 } else { 0 }
is not allowed inconst
yet. However, becauseRawVec
is unstable, theempty/empty_in
constructors can be removed when #49146 is done...