Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarify "length" wording in Vec::with_capacity. #49452

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2018
Merged

Clarify "length" wording in Vec::with_capacity. #49452

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions src/liballoc/vec.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -334,9 +334,10 @@ impl<T> Vec<T> {
/// The vector will be able to hold exactly `capacity` elements without
/// reallocating. If `capacity` is 0, the vector will not allocate.
///
/// It is important to note that this function does not specify the *length*
/// of the returned vector, but only the *capacity*. For an explanation of
/// the difference between length and capacity, see *[Capacity and reallocation]*.
/// It is important to note that although the returned vector has the
/// *capacity* specified, the vector will have a zero *length*. For an
/// explanation of the difference between length and capacity, see
/// *[Capacity and reallocation]*.
///
/// [Capacity and reallocation]: #capacity-and-reallocation
///
Expand Down