Update rls-data for save analysis #45096

DSpeckhals · 2017-10-07T21:27:51Z

rls-data: 0.10 -> 0.11

This will allow for more fine-grained save analysis for enum variants (tuple and struct).

The first commit updates rls-data, and makes the changes to dump_visitor. The second commit updates the rls submodule, and removes "members" that were deleted from that update in src/Cargo.toml.

Note, that when building the project, rustfmt-nightly was updated in Cargo.lock. If these changes should be excluded, I can revert it.

cc/ @nrc

0.10 -> 0.11 This will allow for more fine-grained save analysis for enum variants (tuple and struct)

rust-highfive · 2017-10-07T21:27:56Z

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @arielb1 (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

carols10cents · 2017-10-09T14:05:46Z

Thanks for the PR! We’ll periodically check in on it to make sure that @arielb1 or someone else from the team reviews it soon.

arielb1 · 2017-10-11T12:04:35Z

r? @jonathandturner

alexcrichton · 2017-10-11T15:01:14Z

Thanks for the PR! Can this also update the rustfmt submodule? It looks like this is pulling in rustfmt from crates.io but we'd prefer it to come from the in-tree submodule to ensure that all tools are using the same version.

sunjay · 2017-10-11T15:09:47Z

I have some instructions that should help you update the rustfmt submodule. Please let me know in the PR if you run into anything so I can update the instructions before they get merged.

DSpeckhals · 2017-10-11T16:15:33Z

@alexcrichton I pushed a commit that updates rustfmt.

@sunjay Thanks for the tips! They saved me some frustration.

alexcrichton · 2017-10-11T17:44:52Z

@bors: r+

bors · 2017-10-11T17:44:53Z

📌 Commit 218103e has been approved by alexcrichton

sophiajt · 2017-10-13T10:53:40Z

r? @alexcrichton

bors · 2017-10-13T23:56:24Z

⌛ Testing commit 218103e with merge 33a10f59619a455f8479ac4db5da648ca9f8fd5c...

bors · 2017-10-14T01:43:38Z

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

kennytm · 2017-10-14T05:35:37Z

RLS tests failed on Windows.

[01:39:36] running 26 tests
[01:39:36] test actions::test::test_find_word_at_pos ... ok
[01:39:36] test server::test_parse_as_notification ... ok
[01:39:36] test build::cargo::test::test_dedup_flags ... ok
[01:39:36] test test::test_all_features ... ok
[01:39:37] test test::test_bin_lib_project ... ok
[01:39:37] {"message":"cannot find struct, variant or union type `LibCfgTestStruct` in module `bin_lib`","code":{"code":"E0422","explanation":"\nYou are trying to use an identifier that is either undefined or not a struct.\nErroneous code example:\n\n```compile_fail,E0422\nfn main () {\n    let x = Foo { x: 1, y: 2 };\n}\n```\n\nIn this case, `Foo` is undefined, so it inherently isn't anything, and\ndefinitely not a struct.\n\n```compile_fail\nfn main () {\n    let foo = 1;\n    let x = foo { x: 1, y: 2 };\n}\n```\n\nIn this case, `foo` is defined, but is not a struct, so Rust can't use it as\none.\n"},"level":"error","spans":[{"file_name":"test_data\\bin_lib\\src\\main.rs","byte_start":121,"byte_end":137,"line_start":6,"line_end":6,"column_start":25,"column_end":41,"is_primary":true,"text":[{"text":"    let test = bin_lib::LibCfgTestStruct { };","highlight_start":25,"highlight_end":41}],"label":"not found in `bin_lib`","suggested_replacement":null,"expansion":null}],"children":[],"rendered":null}
[01:39:37] test test::test_bin_lib_project_no_cfg_test ... ok
[01:39:37] test test::test_borrow_error ... ok
[01:39:38] test test::test_completion ... ok
[01:39:38] test test::test_find_all_refs ... ok
[01:39:39] test test::test_find_all_refs_no_cfg_test ... ok
[01:39:39] test test::test_find_impls ... ok
[01:39:40] test test::test_goto_def ... ok
[01:39:41] test test::test_highlight ... ok
[01:39:41] test test::test_hover ... ok
[01:39:42] test test::test_infer_bin ... ok
[01:39:42] test test::test_infer_custom_bin ... ok
[01:39:43] test test::test_infer_lib ... ok
[01:39:43] test test::test_multiple_binaries ... ok
[01:40:37] test test::test_features has been running for over 60 seconds
[01:40:43] test test::test_no_default_features has been running for over 60 seconds
[01:44:57] test test::test_features ... FAILED
[01:44:57] test test::test_omit_init_build ... ok
[01:44:57] test test::test_parse_error_on_malformed_input ... ok
[01:44:58] test test::test_reformat ... ok
[01:44:58] test test::test_reformat_with_range ... ok
[01:44:59] test test::test_rename ... ok
[01:45:00] test test::test_workspace_symbol ... FAILED
[01:45:03] test test::test_no_default_features ... FAILED
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] failures:
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] ---- test::test_features stdout ----
[01:45:03] 	thread 'test::test_features' panicked at 'Hit timeout', src\tools\rls\src\test\harness.rs:189:12
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] ---- test::test_workspace_symbol stdout ----
[01:45:03] 	expect_messages:
[01:45:03]   results: [
[01:45:03]     "{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":0,\"result\":{\"capabilities\":{\"textDocumentSync\":2,\"hoverProvider\":true,\"completionProvider\":{\"resolveProvider\":true,\"triggerCharacters\":[\".\",\":\"]},\"definitionProvider\":true,\"referencesProvider\":true,\"documentHighlightProvider\":true,\"documentSymbolProvider\":true,\"workspaceSymbolProvider\":true,\"codeActionProvider\":true,\"documentFormattingProvider\":true,\"documentRangeFormattingProvider\":false,\"renameProvider\":true,\"executeCommandProvider\":{\"commands\":[\"rls.applySuggestion\"]}}}}",
[01:45:03]     "{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"method\":\"rustDocument/beginBuild\",\"params\":null}",
[01:45:03]     "{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"method\":\"rustDocument/diagnosticsBegin\",\"params\":null}",
[01:45:03]     "{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"method\":\"rustDocument/diagnosticsEnd\",\"params\":null}"
[01:45:03] ],
[01:45:03]   expected: [
[01:45:03]     ExpectedMessage {
[01:45:03]         id: Some(
[01:45:03]             0
[01:45:03]         ),
[01:45:03]         contains: [
[01:45:03]             "capabilities"
[01:45:03]         ]
[01:45:03]     },
[01:45:03]     ExpectedMessage {
[01:45:03]         id: None,
[01:45:03]         contains: [
[01:45:03]             "beginBuild"
[01:45:03]         ]
[01:45:03]     },
[01:45:03]     ExpectedMessage {
[01:45:03]         id: None,
[01:45:03]         contains: [
[01:45:03]             "diagnosticsBegin"
[01:45:03]         ]
[01:45:03]     },
[01:45:03]     ExpectedMessage {
[01:45:03]         id: None,
[01:45:03]         contains: [
[01:45:03]             "diagnosticsEnd"
[01:45:03]         ]
[01:45:03]     }
[01:45:03] ]
[01:45:03] expect_messages:
[01:45:03]   results: [
[01:45:03]     "{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":42,\"result\":[{\"name\":\"nemo\",\"kind\":12,\"location\":{\"uri\":\"file:///C:/projects/rust/src/tools/rls/test_data/workspace_symbol/src/main.rs\",\"range\":{\"start\":{\"line\":11,\"character\":11},\"end\":{\"line\":11,\"character\":15}}},\"containerName\":\"x\"},{\"name\":\"nemo\",\"kind\":2,\"location\":{\"uri\":\"file:///C:/projects/rust/src/tools/rls/test_data/workspace_symbol/src/foo.rs\",\"range\":{\"start\":{\"line\":0,\"character\":4},\"end\":{\"line\":0,\"character\":8}}},\"containerName\":\"foo\"}]}"
[01:45:03] ],
[01:45:03]   expected: [
[01:45:03]     ExpectedMessage {
[01:45:03]         id: Some(
[01:45:03]             42
[01:45:03]         ),
[01:45:03]         contains: [
[01:45:03]             "\"id\":42",
[01:45:03]             "main.rs",
[01:45:03]             "\"name\":\"nemo\"",
[01:45:03]             "\"kind\":12",
[01:45:03]             "\"range\":{\"start\":{\"line\":11,\"character\":11},\"end\":{\"line\":11,\"character\":15}}",
[01:45:03]             "\"containerName\":\"x\"",
[01:45:03]             "foo.rs",
[01:45:03]             "\"name\":\"nemo\"",
[01:45:03]             "\"kind\":5",
[01:45:03]             "\"range\":{\"start\":{\"line\":0,\"character\":4},\"end\":{\"line\":0,\"character\":8}}",
[01:45:03]             "\"containerName\":\"foo\""
[01:45:03]         ]
[01:45:03]     }
[01:45:03] ]
[01:45:03] thread 'test::test_workspace_symbol' panicked at 'Could not find `"kind":5` in `{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":42,"result":[{"name":"nemo","kind":12,"location":{"uri":"file:///C:/projects/rust/src/tools/rls/test_data/workspace_symbol/src/main.rs","range":{"start":{"line":11,"character":11},"end":{"line":11,"character":15}}},"containerName":"x"},{"name":"nemo","kind":2,"location":{"uri":"file:///C:/projects/rust/src/tools/rls/test_data/workspace_symbol/src/foo.rs","range":{"start":{"line":0,"character":4},"end":{"line":0,"character":8}}},"containerName":"foo"}]}`', src\libcore\option.rs:839:4
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] ---- test::test_no_default_features stdout ----
[01:45:03] 	thread 'test::test_no_default_features' panicked at 'Hit timeout', src\tools\rls\src\test\harness.rs:189:12
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] failures:
[01:45:03]     test::test_features
[01:45:03]     test::test_no_default_features
[01:45:03]     test::test_workspace_symbol
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] test result: FAILED. 23 passed; 3 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] error: test failed, to rerun pass '--bin rls'
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] command did not execute successfully: "C:\\projects\\rust\\build\\x86_64-pc-windows-msvc\\stage0/bin\\cargo.exe" "test" "--target" "x86_64-pc-windows-msvc" "--release" "--locked" "--color" "always" "--manifest-path" "C:\\projects\\rust\\src/tools/rls\\Cargo.toml"
[01:45:03] expected success, got: exit code: 101
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] 
[01:45:03] You can disable the tool in `src/tools/toolstate.toml`

DSpeckhals · 2017-10-14T06:22:39Z

Hmmm...the test failures only happen when running the tests with x.py. Running with cargo test within the RLS works fine.

I know why test::test_features and test::test_no_default_features are failing (easy fix in src/Cargo.toml), but I'm unsure about test::test_workspace_symbol. It seems like a versioning mismatch with rls-data between rustc and rls. Again, this test is passing when running with nightly (10-13) on the RLS, but not with x.py. I'm not well-versed on the nuances between the test runners. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

bors · 2017-10-14T18:48:57Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #45175) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

alexcrichton · 2017-10-16T16:08:46Z

Can you reproduce with ./x.py test src/tools/rls?

DSpeckhals · 2017-10-16T16:44:01Z

Can you reproduce with ./x.py test src/tools/rls?

Yes.

But not while running cargo test within rls. I'm thinking it has something to do with which rustc is being run with the RLS. I've been trying to debug it.

alexcrichton · 2017-10-16T18:53:43Z

Maybe other dependencies have a slightly different version? I've had great difficulty myself in debugging rls tests historically... I've found though that RUST_LOG tends to be helpful in diagnosing failures.

alexcrichton · 2017-10-23T15:47:36Z

@bors: r+

bors · 2017-10-23T15:47:37Z

📌 Commit 933b3fb has been approved by alexcrichton

bors · 2017-10-23T23:36:18Z

⌛ Testing commit 933b3fbf9bdeb978f96132c959bf2042b4513c73 with merge 9569d3e0e27f939e9d05c6e44caf06bcf161e085...

bors · 2017-10-24T01:20:06Z

💔 Test failed - status-travis

kennytm · 2017-10-24T01:28:57Z

x86_64-gnu-aux failed, the RLS test test_bin_lib_project did not pass.

[01:35:39] test test::test_bin_lib_project has been running for over 60 seconds
[01:39:59] test test::test_bin_lib_project ... FAILED
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59] failures:
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59] ---- test::test_bin_lib_project stdout ----
[01:39:59] thread 'test::test_bin_lib_project' panicked at 'Hit timeout', /checkout/src/tools/rls/src/test/harness.rs:189:12
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59] failures:
[01:39:59] test::test_bin_lib_project
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59] test result: FAILED. 26 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59] error: test failed, to rerun pass '--bin rls'
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59] command did not execute successfully: "/checkout/obj/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/cargo" "test" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--release" "--locked" "--color" "always" "--manifest-path" "/checkout/src/tools/rls/Cargo.toml"
[01:39:59] expected success, got: exit code: 101
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59]
[01:39:59] You can disable the tool in `src/tools/toolstate.toml`

DSpeckhals · 2017-10-24T01:31:06Z

The failure is an intermittent timing issue with new tests in the RLS. See rust-lang/rls#524 for context.

Until the fix is made, would it be reasonable to mark the RLS as "Compiling" instead of "Testing" in src/tools/toolstate.toml?

bors · 2017-10-24T03:56:13Z

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #44766) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

alexcrichton · 2017-10-25T13:54:17Z

@bors: r+

bors · 2017-10-25T13:54:18Z

📌 Commit aba409c has been approved by alexcrichton

bors · 2017-10-26T00:58:59Z

⌛ Testing commit aba409c with merge fa29bce...

@nrc

…r=alexcrichton Update rls-data for save analysis rls-data: 0.10 -> 0.11 This will allow for more fine-grained save analysis for enum variants (tuple and struct). The first commit updates rls-data, and makes the changes to dump_visitor. The second commit updates the rls submodule, and removes "members" that were deleted from that update in src/Cargo.toml. Note, that when building the project, rustfmt-nightly was updated in Cargo.lock. If these changes should be excluded, I can revert it. cc/ @nrc

bors · 2017-10-26T03:35:38Z

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing fa29bce to master...

DSpeckhals added 2 commits October 7, 2017 16:12

Update rls-data for librustc-save-analysis

57d0410

0.10 -> 0.11 This will allow for more fine-grained save analysis for enum variants (tuple and struct)

Update rls submodule

dcb915e

rust-highfive assigned arielb1 Oct 7, 2017

carols10cents added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 9, 2017

sunjay mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2017

Move Generics from MethodSig to TraitItem and ImplItem #44766

Merged

rust-highfive assigned sophiajt and unassigned arielb1 Oct 11, 2017

Update rustfmt along with rls

218103e

rust-highfive assigned alexcrichton and unassigned sophiajt Oct 13, 2017

kennytm added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 14, 2017

kennytm added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 21, 2017

kennytm added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 24, 2017

bors mentioned this pull request Oct 24, 2017

bootstrap: Add openssl configuration for sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu #45465

Merged

kennytm added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Oct 24, 2017

kennytm added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Oct 24, 2017

DSpeckhals added 2 commits October 24, 2017 19:37

Merge branch 'master' into update-rls-data-for-save-analysis

bca47e4

Update RLS with skip of failing test

aba409c

kennytm added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 25, 2017

DSpeckhals mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2017

Incorrect Symbol kind being returned / rls-data version mismatch rust-lang/rls#529

Closed

bors merged commit aba409c into rust-lang:master Oct 26, 2017

bors mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2017

Emit crate disambiguators in save-analysis data #45468

Merged

DSpeckhals mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2017

RLS categorizes enums as arrays rust-lang/vscode-rust#140

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Update rls-data for save analysis #45096

Update rls-data for save analysis #45096

DSpeckhals commented Oct 7, 2017

rust-highfive commented Oct 7, 2017

carols10cents commented Oct 9, 2017

arielb1 commented Oct 11, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 11, 2017

sunjay commented Oct 11, 2017

DSpeckhals commented Oct 11, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 11, 2017

bors commented Oct 11, 2017

sophiajt commented Oct 13, 2017

bors commented Oct 13, 2017

bors commented Oct 14, 2017

kennytm commented Oct 14, 2017

DSpeckhals commented Oct 14, 2017

bors commented Oct 14, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 16, 2017

DSpeckhals commented Oct 16, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 16, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 23, 2017

bors commented Oct 23, 2017

bors commented Oct 23, 2017

bors commented Oct 24, 2017

kennytm commented Oct 24, 2017

DSpeckhals commented Oct 24, 2017

bors commented Oct 24, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 25, 2017

bors commented Oct 25, 2017

bors commented Oct 26, 2017

bors commented Oct 26, 2017

Update rls-data for save analysis #45096

Update rls-data for save analysis #45096

Conversation

DSpeckhals commented Oct 7, 2017

rust-highfive commented Oct 7, 2017

carols10cents commented Oct 9, 2017

arielb1 commented Oct 11, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 11, 2017

sunjay commented Oct 11, 2017

DSpeckhals commented Oct 11, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 11, 2017

bors commented Oct 11, 2017

sophiajt commented Oct 13, 2017

bors commented Oct 13, 2017

bors commented Oct 14, 2017

kennytm commented Oct 14, 2017

DSpeckhals commented Oct 14, 2017

bors commented Oct 14, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 16, 2017

DSpeckhals commented Oct 16, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 16, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 23, 2017

bors commented Oct 23, 2017

bors commented Oct 23, 2017

bors commented Oct 24, 2017

kennytm commented Oct 24, 2017

DSpeckhals commented Oct 24, 2017

bors commented Oct 24, 2017

alexcrichton commented Oct 25, 2017

bors commented Oct 25, 2017

bors commented Oct 26, 2017

bors commented Oct 26, 2017