Remove struct_field_attributes feature gate

[tirr-c]

Part of #41681. This PR only removes the feature gate; this does not update any documentations. This PR removes the feature gate and the corresponding chapter of the Unstable Book.

I'm not very sure about the changes I made though... Just followed the stabilization guideline.

r? @nikomatsakis

[rust-highfive]

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @nikomatsakis (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

[est31]

This PR only removes the feature gate; this does not update any documentations.

You have to update the unstable book and remove its chapter on this feature in order for this PR to pass tidy and get merged.

[nikomatsakis]

@VBChunguk

Indeed, as @est31 pointed out, we see this tidy error:

[00:03:00] * 134 features
[00:03:00] tidy error: The Unstable Book has a 'language feature' section 'struct_field_attributes' which doesn't correspond to an unstable language feature
[00:03:00] some tidy checks failed

@est31, maybe you can write up some brief instructions on what files to edit? We can put them in the forge description.

[est31]

@est31, maybe you can write up some brief instructions on what files to edit?

Its already documented:

If any documentation for this feature exists, it should be in the Unstable Book, located at src/doc/unstable-book. Regardless of its existence, the page for the feature gate should be removed.

The wording is too much in the should and should more be like "needs to be removed". After all its a tidy issue that disallows the PR to be merged.

[tirr-c]

@nikomatsakis @est31 I've removed the chapter from the Unstable Book. It passed tidy checks when I ran it locally. Is this the only thing I should do?

[est31]

@VBChunguk I think so, yes. Of course, the (other) docs need to be updated but that can be managed separately.

[tirr-c]

@nikomatsakis @est31 Thanks for helping me on this PR! This is the first time I contribute to such huge project like this.

I should have added tidy checks in the pre-push hook...

[nikomatsakis]

@VBChunguk no worries. I submit half-tested stuff all the time. ;) That's what travis is for, the way I see it. :)

[nikomatsakis]

I think this all looks right. Thanks @VBChunguk !

[nikomatsakis]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 65288f4 has been approved by nikomatsakis

[frewsxcv]

@bors rollup