Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove not(stage0) from deny(warnings) #38679

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2017

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Historically this was done to accommodate bugs in lints, but there hasn't been a
bug in a lint since this feature was added which the warnings affected. Let's
completely purge warnings from all our stages by denying warnings in all stages.
This will also assist in tracking down stage0 code to be removed whenever
we're updating the bootstrap compiler.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nrc

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

Historically this was done to accommodate bugs in lints, but there hasn't been a
bug in a lint since this feature was added which the warnings affected. Let's
completely purge warnings from all our stages by denying warnings in all stages.
This will also assist in tracking down `stage0` code to be removed whenever
we're updating the bootstrap compiler.
@nrc
Copy link
Member

nrc commented Jan 4, 2017

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 4, 2017

📌 Commit 9b0b5b4 has been approved by nrc

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 4, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 9b0b5b4 with merge 4eaaae7...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2017
Remove not(stage0) from deny(warnings)

Historically this was done to accommodate bugs in lints, but there hasn't been a
bug in a lint since this feature was added which the warnings affected. Let's
completely purge warnings from all our stages by denying warnings in all stages.
This will also assist in tracking down `stage0` code to be removed whenever
we're updating the bootstrap compiler.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 4, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Jan 4, 2017 via email

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 5, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 9b0b5b4 with merge d115fd5...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 5, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-travis

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Jan 5, 2017 via email

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 9b0b5b4 with merge f97103a...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 7, 2017
Remove not(stage0) from deny(warnings)

Historically this was done to accommodate bugs in lints, but there hasn't been a
bug in a lint since this feature was added which the warnings affected. Let's
completely purge warnings from all our stages by denying warnings in all stages.
This will also assist in tracking down `stage0` code to be removed whenever
we're updating the bootstrap compiler.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 7, 2017

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

alexcrichton commented Jan 8, 2017 via email

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2017

⌛ Testing commit 9b0b5b4 with merge 7ac9d33...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2017
Remove not(stage0) from deny(warnings)

Historically this was done to accommodate bugs in lints, but there hasn't been a
bug in a lint since this feature was added which the warnings affected. Let's
completely purge warnings from all our stages by denying warnings in all stages.
This will also assist in tracking down `stage0` code to be removed whenever
we're updating the bootstrap compiler.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jan 8, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: nrc
Pushing 7ac9d33 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 9b0b5b4 into rust-lang:master Jan 8, 2017
@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the always-deny-warnings branch January 13, 2017 23:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants