-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify zero-value behavior of ctlz
/cttz
intrinsics.
#38310
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @aturon (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
Hold off on reviewing. Going to discuss this at this week's docs team meeting. |
@frewsxcv Ok, let me know when you're ready. |
@@ -1156,10 +1156,44 @@ extern "rust-intrinsic" { | |||
/// Returns the number of bits set in an integer type `T` | |||
pub fn ctpop<T>(x: T) -> T; | |||
|
|||
/// Returns the number of leading bits unset in an integer type `T` | |||
/// Returns the number of leading unset bits (zeroes) in an integer type `T`. Unlike the | |||
/// underlying LLVM intrinsic, an `x` with value `0` will always return the bit width of `T`. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First of all, underlying LLVM intrinsic has a prototype that looks like this:
declare iXYZ @llvm.ctlz.iXYZ(iXYZ <src>, i1 <is_zero_undef>)
so comparing it to the underlying LLVM intrinsic is not quite right :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could just ditch this sentence and not talk about LLVM but leave the x = 0
example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed that sentence in the latest force push.
@bors r+ rollup |
📌 Commit a99f70b has been approved by |
Clarify zero-value behavior of `ctlz`/`cttz` intrinsics. Fixes rust-lang#34381.
Clarify zero-value behavior of `ctlz`/`cttz` intrinsics. Fixes rust-lang#34381.
Clarify zero-value behavior of `ctlz`/`cttz` intrinsics. Fixes #34381.
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Fixes #34381.