Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify zero-value behavior of ctlz/cttz intrinsics. #38310

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2017

Conversation

frewsxcv
Copy link
Member

Fixes #34381.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @aturon (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member Author

Hold off on reviewing. Going to discuss this at this week's docs team meeting.

@aturon
Copy link
Member

aturon commented Dec 12, 2016

@frewsxcv Ok, let me know when you're ready.

@@ -1156,10 +1156,44 @@ extern "rust-intrinsic" {
/// Returns the number of bits set in an integer type `T`
pub fn ctpop<T>(x: T) -> T;

/// Returns the number of leading bits unset in an integer type `T`
/// Returns the number of leading unset bits (zeroes) in an integer type `T`. Unlike the
/// underlying LLVM intrinsic, an `x` with value `0` will always return the bit width of `T`.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First of all, underlying LLVM intrinsic has a prototype that looks like this:

declare iXYZ @llvm.ctlz.iXYZ(iXYZ <src>, i1 <is_zero_undef>)

so comparing it to the underlying LLVM intrinsic is not quite right :)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I could just ditch this sentence and not talk about LLVM but leave the x = 0 example.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed that sentence in the latest force push.

@frewsxcv
Copy link
Member Author

@aturon @nagisa This is ready for review now.

@frewsxcv frewsxcv requested a review from aturon December 15, 2016 17:54
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

pnkfelix commented Jan 3, 2017

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 3, 2017

📌 Commit a99f70b has been approved by pnkfelix

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2017
Clarify zero-value behavior of `ctlz`/`cttz` intrinsics.

Fixes rust-lang#34381.
steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2017
Clarify zero-value behavior of `ctlz`/`cttz` intrinsics.

Fixes rust-lang#34381.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 9, 2017

⌛ Testing commit a99f70b with merge bd16aa0...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2017
Clarify zero-value behavior of `ctlz`/`cttz` intrinsics.

Fixes #34381.
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 9, 2017

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: pnkfelix
Pushing bd16aa0 to master...

@bors bors merged commit a99f70b into rust-lang:master Jan 9, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants