Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing inline code delimiters around Vec<T> #34847

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2016
Merged

Add missing inline code delimiters around Vec<T> #34847

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2016

Conversation

baskerville
Copy link
Contributor

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@apasel422
Copy link
Contributor

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 16, 2016

📌 Commit fc0d037 has been approved by apasel422

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2016
Add missing inline code delimiters around Vec<T>

r? @steveklabnik
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2016
Rollup of 7 pull requests

- Successful merges: #33362, #34768, #34837, #34838, #34847, #34848, #34849
- Failed merges: #33951, #34850
@bors bors merged commit fc0d037 into rust-lang:master Jul 17, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants