Revert "Skip rustc book on i686" - #162553
Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit intoSep 10, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@bors try jobs=dist-i686-msvc |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 9, 2026
Revert "Skip rustc book on i686" try-job: dist-i686-msvc
Member
Author
JonathanBrouwer
marked this pull request as ready for review
September 9, 2026 20:31
Collaborator
|
Warning If you are changing how CI LLVM is built or linked, make sure to bump cc @jieyouxu |
Contributor
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2026
Contributor
Zalathar
added a commit
to Zalathar/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2026
…skip, r=jieyouxu Revert "Skip rustc book on i686" Reverts rust-lang#158379 This should not be needed anymore since rust-lang#162288 merged
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2026
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #158191 (Suggest installing `rust-src` when standard library source is unavailable) - #162122 (Put manual calls of Enzyme intrinsics behind a feature gate) - #162553 (Revert "Skip rustc book on i686") - #162562 (Add regression test for higher-ranked fn pointer trait impl mismatch errors) - #162518 (Add a revision for previously fixed solver issue)
Contributor
|
⌛ Testing commit 8511054 with merge 87547e8... Workflow: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/34434200369 |
Member
|
@bors yield (to beta backports, which flaked out) |
Contributor
|
Auto build was cancelled. Cancelled workflows: The next pull request likely to be tested is #162567. |
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 10, 2026
Rollup of 4 pull requests Successful merges: - #162122 (Put manual calls of Enzyme intrinsics behind a feature gate) - #162553 (Revert "Skip rustc book on i686") - #162562 (Add regression test for higher-ranked fn pointer trait impl mismatch errors) - #162518 (Add a revision for previously fixed solver issue)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #158379
This should not be needed anymore since #162288 merged