Skip to content

explicitly state that allocations cannot grow to the left - #161747

Merged
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
RalfJung:alloc-growth
Aug 26, 2026
Merged

explicitly state that allocations cannot grow to the left#161747
rust-bors[bot] merged 1 commit into
rust-lang:mainfrom
RalfJung:alloc-growth

Conversation

@RalfJung

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This was already implied, but it seems better to make this explicit.

Cc @rust-lang/opsem

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 25, 2026
@rustbot

rustbot commented Aug 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

r? @LawnGnome

rustbot has assigned @LawnGnome.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

  • Owners of files modified in this PR: libs
  • libs expanded to 12 candidates
  • Random selection from JohnTitor, LawnGnome, Mark-Simulacrum, clarfonthey, nia-e

@saethlin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

r? me
@bors r+ rollup

I agree this was already implied, don't see any reason to let the PR sit around for a while.

@rust-bors

rust-bors Bot commented Aug 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📌 Commit 57bb4d1 has been approved by saethlin

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors Bot added the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Aug 26, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors Bot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 26, 2026
jhpratt added a commit to jhpratt/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2026
explicitly state that allocations cannot grow to the left

This was already implied, but it seems better to make this explicit.

Cc @rust-lang/opsem
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2026
…uwer

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #157036 (lint against repeated repr attributes)
 - #160183 (panic_unwind: Use global_asm! for IMGREL relocations)
 - #161718 (Fix the wasm32-unknown-unknown target feature/cfg bug)
 - #161673 (Fix broken link to lang_items.rs in unstable book)
 - #161744 (Remove `RawDefPathHash`)
 - #161747 (explicitly state that allocations cannot grow to the left)
 - #161796 (Remove dead parse error recovery (underscores in expressions))
@rust-bors
rust-bors Bot merged commit 3657478 into rust-lang:main Aug 26, 2026
13 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.100.0 milestone Aug 26, 2026
rust-bors Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2026
Rollup merge of #161747 - RalfJung:alloc-growth, r=saethlin

explicitly state that allocations cannot grow to the left

This was already implied, but it seems better to make this explicit.

Cc @rust-lang/opsem
@RalfJung
RalfJung deleted the alloc-growth branch August 29, 2026 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants