Skip to content

Post-attribute ports cleanup pt. 1#154808

Open
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 8 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:attr_cleanup
Open

Post-attribute ports cleanup pt. 1#154808
JonathanBrouwer wants to merge 8 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
JonathanBrouwer:attr_cleanup

Conversation

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JonathanBrouwer JonathanBrouwer commented Apr 4, 2026

View all comments

r? @jdonszelmann

This cleans up some checks I could find were for non-parsed attributes, and works towards removing BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTES

All commits do one thing and every commit passes tests, so best reviewed commit by commit

@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 4, 2026

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs

cc @jdonszelmann

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Apr 4, 2026
@Bryntet
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Bryntet commented Apr 4, 2026

Let's gooo!!!!

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Just in case, not expecting any impact
@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 4, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@bors try cancel
@bors try

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 4, 2026

Try build cancelled. Cancelled workflows:

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 4, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 80c2a26 (80c2a26a6a19dacecb6e324e40dbaf1af1307e6c, parent: e0e95a71872dfe9e15d22bddea9ac45c85ddda1a)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (80c2a26): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.2% [0.2%, 0.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.2% [-0.2%, -0.2%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.3%, secondary 0.5%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.0% [1.8%, 4.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.0% [-2.2%, -1.9%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary 1.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
5.3% [3.0%, 7.6%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-3.3%, -2.5%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

Results (primary -0.1%, secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.1% [-0.1%, -0.0%] 56
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.1% [-0.1%, -0.0%] 25
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.1% [-0.1%, -0.0%] 56

Bootstrap: 489.285s -> 487.19s (-0.43%)
Artifact size: 395.03 MiB -> 394.99 MiB (-0.01%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Apr 5, 2026
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

That's just noise :)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jdonszelmann jdonszelmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some small things, but in general: damn I'm so happy to see this. Been waiting a year an a half to do this. Thanks to everyone who joined the effort to get to this point, and thanks Jonathan for finally starting The Big Clean Up ™️

View changes since this review

// `TyCtxt::check_mod_attrs`), but by the time that runs the macro
// is expanded, and it doesn't give an error.
validate_attr::emit_fatal_malformed_builtin_attribute(&sess.psess, first_path, sym::path);
emit_malformed_attribute(&sess.psess, first_path.style, first_path.span, sym::path, template!(
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this should maybe also be a parsed attribute 🤔

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, I tried to make it one but then discovered #154781, so it is blocked on that

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 5, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 5, 2026

Reminder, once the PR becomes ready for a review, use @rustbot ready.

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 5, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Apr 6, 2026
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2026
[NO MERGE] Debug PR for #154808


try-job: i686-mscv-2
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2026
[NO MERGE] Debug PR for #154808


try-job: i686-msvc-2
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2026
[NO MERGE] Debug PR for #154808


try-job: i686-msvc-2
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 6, 2026

💥 Test timed out after 21600s

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2026
[NO MERGE] Debug PR for #154808


try-job: i686-msvc-2
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2026
[NO MERGE] Debug2 PR for #154808#154873


try-job: i686-msvc-2
rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2026
[NO MERGE] Debug PR for #154808


try-job: i686-msvc-2
@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

^ Figured out which commit is the problematic one and removed it, didn't figure out why it is problematic yet
@bors try jobs=i686-msvc-2

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
Post-attribute ports cleanup pt. 1


try-job: i686-msvc-2
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 7, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: bb4de55 (bb4de55f9370d729915bebad8e4b07c8f2fa4646, parent: bcded331651b60a0383b3ff51db4f24c4495ac53)

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

JonathanBrouwer commented Apr 7, 2026

@bors r=jdonszelmann
For now lets merge this without the problematic commit, while I figure out what the problem with that commit is

@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Apr 7, 2026

📌 Commit 89db636 has been approved by jdonszelmann

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Apr 7, 2026
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
…onszelmann

Post-attribute ports cleanup pt. 1

r? @jdonszelmann

This cleans up some checks I could find were for non-parsed attributes, and works towards removing BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTES

All commits do one thing and every commit passes tests, so best reviewed commit by commit
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
…onszelmann

Post-attribute ports cleanup pt. 1

r? @jdonszelmann

This cleans up some checks I could find were for non-parsed attributes, and works towards removing BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTES

All commits do one thing and every commit passes tests, so best reviewed commit by commit
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
…onszelmann

Post-attribute ports cleanup pt. 1

r? @jdonszelmann

This cleans up some checks I could find were for non-parsed attributes, and works towards removing BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTES

All commits do one thing and every commit passes tests, so best reviewed commit by commit
JonathanBrouwer added a commit to JonathanBrouwer/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2026
…onszelmann

Post-attribute ports cleanup pt. 1

r? @jdonszelmann

This cleans up some checks I could find were for non-parsed attributes, and works towards removing BUILTIN_ATTRIBUTES

All commits do one thing and every commit passes tests, so best reviewed commit by commit
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants