Skip to content

Test perf regression for 154344#154484

Closed
dianqk wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
dianqk:test-perf-regression
Closed

Test perf regression for 154344#154484
dianqk wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
dianqk:test-perf-regression

Conversation

@dianqk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dianqk dianqk commented Mar 27, 2026

No description provided.

@rustbot rustbot added A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Mar 27, 2026
@dianqk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

dianqk commented Mar 27, 2026

@bors try @rust-timer queue

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2026
@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 27, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Mar 28, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 5b2d134 (5b2d134bea9724f0ccb1640b0e5e08acbd46de57, parent: fda6d37bb88ee12fd50fa54d15859f1f91b74f55)

@rust-timer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (5b2d134): comparison URL.

Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-0.7% [-1.3%, -0.2%] 22
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.5% [-1.0%, -0.2%] 7
All ❌✅ (primary) -0.7% [-1.3%, -0.2%] 22

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -2.2%, secondary 2.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
7.1% [7.1%, 7.1%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.9% [-2.9%, -2.9%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.2% [-2.2%, -2.2%] 1

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.3%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.3% [-3.3%, -3.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 485.109s -> 484.425s (-0.14%)
Artifact size: 395.05 MiB -> 397.06 MiB (0.51%)

@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Mar 28, 2026
@dianqk dianqk closed this Mar 28, 2026
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Mar 28, 2026
@dianqk dianqk deleted the test-perf-regression branch March 28, 2026 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-LLVM Area: Code generation parts specific to LLVM. Both correctness bugs and optimization-related issues.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants