TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize #148823

lcnr · 2025-11-11T15:41:44Z

fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#250

r? BoxyUwU

rustbot · 2025-11-11T15:41:47Z

changes to the core type system

cc @compiler-errors, @lcnr

rustbot · 2025-11-11T15:41:50Z

BoxyUwU is currently at their maximum review capacity.
They may take a while to respond.

lcnr · 2025-11-11T15:41:53Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize

rust-bors · 2025-11-11T17:59:50Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 20a081a (20a081aa36c390f34fa701ef245698110b60e282, parent: 9312cd6d38396a13a08be73bb589fb1cf3dd32e6)

rust-timer · 2025-11-11T19:25:19Z

Finished benchmarking commit (20a081a): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.3%	[2.0%, 2.8%]	6
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.7%	[0.1%, 15.2%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-1.3%, -1.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.8%	[-1.3%, 2.8%]	7

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 1.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	3.9%	[3.9%, 3.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.4%	[-1.4%, -1.4%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (primary 2.3%, secondary 10.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.3%	[2.2%, 2.5%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	10.1%	[2.6%, 14.9%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.3%	[2.2%, 2.5%]	3

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 477.625s -> 479.621s (0.42%)
Artifact size: 391.41 MiB -> 391.37 MiB (-0.01%)

lcnr · 2025-11-12T10:57:31Z

@bors try @rust-timer queue

TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize

rust-bors · 2025-11-12T13:13:29Z

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 3d1dd7d (3d1dd7d76f85165ff58987a09d383f7d3e8fbb59, parent: 95aeb4696545eb4c9cbb68516f2912770e3846ea)

rust-timer · 2025-11-12T15:27:23Z

Finished benchmarking commit (3d1dd7d): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Benchmarking this pull request means it may be perf-sensitive – we'll automatically label it not fit for rolling up. You can override this, but we strongly advise not to, due to possible changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please do so in sufficient writing along with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged. If not, please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If its results are neutral or positive, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	4.0%	[3.4%, 4.8%]	6
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	10.3%	[1.4%, 26.9%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.7%	[-1.4%, -0.0%]	2
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.3%	[-0.3%, -0.2%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.8%	[-1.4%, 4.8%]	8

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.5%, secondary 0.4%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.5%	[1.5%, 1.5%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.8%	[1.5%, 2.0%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.5%	[1.5%, 1.5%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 2.8%, secondary 3.6%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	2.8%	[2.6%, 3.1%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	9.6%	[3.3%, 23.4%]	6
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.4%	[-3.1%, -1.8%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.8%	[2.6%, 3.1%]	3

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 474.976s -> 475.327s (0.07%)
Artifact size: 391.06 MiB -> 391.12 MiB (0.02%)

This removes variance information from some diagnostics. However, that variance information is not actually relevant here. Casting `*const dyn Cat<'a>` to `*const S<dyn Cat<'static>>` is an error regardless of whether `S` requires its argument to be invariant. Wide-pointer casts always require the trait object arguments to be invariant.

rustbot · 2025-12-04T14:44:10Z

This PR was rebased onto a different main commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

lcnr · 2025-12-04T14:45:05Z

@bors r=BoxyUwU rollup=never

bors · 2025-12-04T14:45:08Z

📌 Commit e1be0d2 has been approved by BoxyUwU

It is now in the queue for this repository.

TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#250 r? BoxyUwU

bors · 2025-12-05T14:57:10Z

⌛ Testing commit e1be0d2 with merge 22e80cc...

rust-log-analyzer · 2025-12-05T16:18:54Z

The job i686-msvc-2 failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_passes test:false 100.195
   Compiling rustc_mir_transform v0.0.0 (D:\a\rust\rust\compiler\rustc_mir_transform)
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_const_eval test:false 178.630
   Compiling rustc_borrowck v0.0.0 (D:\a\rust\rust\compiler\rustc_borrowck)
Assertion failed: !KeyInfoT::isEqual(Val, EmptyKey) && !KeyInfoT::isEqual(Val, TombstoneKey) && "Empty/Tombstone value shouldn't be inserted into map!", file D:\a\rust\rust\src\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h, line 698
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_mir_transform test:false 174.045
error: could not compile `rustc_mir_transform` (lib)

Caused by:
  process didn't exit successfully: `D:\a\rust\rust\build\bootstrap\debug\rustc 'D:\a\rust\rust\build\bootstrap\debug\rustc' --crate-name rustc_mir_transform --edition=2024 'compiler\rustc_mir_transform\src\lib.rs' --error-format=json --json=diagnostic-rendered-ansi,artifacts,future-incompat --crate-type lib --emit=dep-info,metadata,link -C opt-level=3 -C embed-bitcode=no -C debug-assertions=on --check-cfg 'cfg(docsrs,test)' --check-cfg 'cfg(feature, values())' -C metadata=a9f927dde36e14a8 -C extra-filename=-eeaa9a753632719f --out-dir 'D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps' --target i686-pc-windows-msvc -L 'dependency=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps' -L 'dependency=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\release\deps' --extern 'either=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\libeither-b0623807329748f8.rmeta' --extern 'hashbrown=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\libhashbrown-3306f33a93800293.rmeta' --extern 'itertools=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\libitertools-ed4edbd05d8567ee.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_abi=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_abi-e66663da941c303b.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_arena=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_arena-918b9a62bef49ff8.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_ast=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_ast-922b8fdc4b28d87b.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_const_eval=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_const_eval-fc9f291cfce222e0.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_data_structures=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_data_structures-bd9eb33a171cc133.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_errors=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_errors-0c7803c4f09a611f.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_fluent_macro=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\release\deps\rustc_fluent_macro-6a9b9571f00ec1ae.dll' --extern 'rustc_hir=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_hir-f8fee4b85c66f261.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_index=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_index-993abffa400d95b0.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_infer=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_infer-fbc26e608d4146b8.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_macros=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\release\deps\rustc_macros-644bb58810d8b30c.dll' --extern 'rustc_middle=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_middle-8fe8c0823e133b89.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_mir_build=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_mir_build-f23036b1867a3c63.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_mir_dataflow=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_mir_dataflow-7d5c2a7c2130cc57.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_session=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_session-c9df7d4cd7c4ddaf.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_span=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_span-1b2351166f5be056.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_target=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_target-8229e6e2ebbea7f6.rmeta' --extern 'rustc_trait_selection=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\librustc_trait_selection-f4e8c378481f834d.rmeta' --extern 'smallvec=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\libsmallvec-f6c7aff23145fe9c.rmeta' --extern 'tracing=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\deps\libtracing-66dbc3f06e5547cc.rmeta' --cfg=windows_raw_dylib -Csymbol-mangling-version=v0 -Zannotate-moves -Zunstable-options '--check-cfg=cfg(bootstrap)' -Zmacro-backtrace -Csplit-debuginfo=packed -Ctarget-feature=+crt-static -Alinker-messages -Zon-broken-pipe=kill -Z binary-dep-depinfo -L 'native=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\build\stacker-98d534daedc1c708\out' -L 'native=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\build\psm-0886f750a5c4fe93\out' -L 'native=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-msvc\stage2-rustc\i686-pc-windows-msvc\release\build\blake3-fbfb16860e30e178\out' -L 'native=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.44.35207\atlmfc\lib\x86' -L 'native=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.44.35207\atlmfc\lib\x86' -L 'native=C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.44.35207\atlmfc\lib\x86'` (exit code: 0xc000001d, STATUS_ILLEGAL_INSTRUCTION)
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_hir_analysis test:false 359.355
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_hir_typeck test:false 313.835
[RUSTC-TIMING] rustc_borrowck test:false 297.168
Bootstrap failed while executing `test --stage 2 --skip=tests --skip=coverage-map --skip=coverage-run --skip=library --skip=tidyselftest`
Build completed unsuccessfully in 1:13:12
make: *** [Makefile:114: ci-msvc-ps1] Error 1
  local time: Fri Dec  5 16:18:36 CUT 2025
  network time: Fri, 05 Dec 2025 16:18:36 GMT
##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.
##[group]Run echo "disk usage:"
echo "disk usage:"

bors · 2025-12-05T16:19:28Z

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

matthiaskrgr · 2025-12-05T17:00:41Z

@bors retry

bors · 2025-12-06T02:53:26Z

⌛ Testing commit e1be0d2 with merge b4f1098...

bors · 2025-12-06T06:02:38Z

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: BoxyUwU
Pushing b4f1098 to main...

github-actions · 2025-12-06T06:05:27Z

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 36b2369 (parent) -> b4f1098 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 15 test diffs

Stage 1

[ui] tests/ui/traits/next-solver/generalize/subtype-obligations-bivariant-args.rs#next: [missing] -> pass (J0)
[ui] tests/ui/traits/next-solver/generalize/subtype-obligations-bivariant-args.rs#old: [missing] -> pass (J0)

Stage 2

[ui] tests/ui/traits/next-solver/generalize/subtype-obligations-bivariant-args.rs#next: [missing] -> pass (J1)
[ui] tests/ui/traits/next-solver/generalize/subtype-obligations-bivariant-args.rs#old: [missing] -> pass (J1)

Additionally, 11 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Job group index

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard b4f1098e10e71139bbdc08df5ea8183e68fc0955 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

dist-aarch64-linux: 9163.9s -> 6451.7s (-29.6%)
x86_64-rust-for-linux: 2619.9s -> 3209.3s (+22.5%)
pr-check-1: 1682.5s -> 2009.8s (+19.5%)
x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-2: 5143.2s -> 6022.1s (+17.1%)
aarch64-gnu-llvm-20-2: 2151.5s -> 2517.0s (+17.0%)
x86_64-gnu-llvm-20: 2382.7s -> 2758.3s (+15.8%)
x86_64-gnu-gcc: 3119.6s -> 3519.4s (+12.8%)
x86_64-gnu-tools: 3142.9s -> 3531.7s (+12.4%)
dist-apple-various: 4221.1s -> 3708.5s (-12.1%)
x86_64-gnu-llvm-20-1: 3153.0s -> 3533.7s (+12.1%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

rust-timer · 2025-12-06T07:24:04Z

Finished benchmarking commit (b4f1098): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR.
This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise.

Next Steps:

If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified,
please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add
@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged to it, to mark the regression as triaged.
If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create
a new PR with a fix for the regression.
If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise,
you can ask the @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance working group for help (members of this group
were already notified of this PR).

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

Our most reliable metric. Used to determine the overall result above. However, even this metric can be noisy.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.5%]	14
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-1.3%, -1.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.2%	[-0.3%, -0.1%]	8
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-1.3%, -1.3%]	1

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.0%, secondary 1.9%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.0%	[1.0%, 1.0%]	1
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.0%	[1.6%, 6.6%]	9
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.3%	[-2.4%, -0.8%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	1.0%	[1.0%, 1.0%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary 3.0%, secondary -1.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.0%	[2.8%, 3.3%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	4.0%	[2.6%, 6.1%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.8%	[-6.6%, -1.8%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.0%	[2.8%, 3.3%]	2

Binary size

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary -0.0%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	1

Bootstrap: 468.958s -> 471.737s (0.59%)
Artifact size: 386.84 MiB -> 388.97 MiB (0.55%)

panstromek · 2025-12-08T13:53:43Z

perf triage:

post-merge results look worse on secondary benchmarks, compared to pre-merge run. The final result still is positive, but only because of 1 primary bechmark. I looked through the secondary regressions and most of them returned back to previous state in next PR, so this is probably noise.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative (-Znext-solver) labels Nov 11, 2025

rustbot assigned BoxyUwU Nov 11, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2025

Auto merge of #148823 - lcnr:generalize-no-subtyping, r=<try>

20a081a

TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 11, 2025

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot added perf-regression Performance regression. and removed S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. labels Nov 11, 2025

lcnr force-pushed the generalize-no-subtyping branch from aafb23b to 3bc3788 Compare November 12, 2025 10:57

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rust-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2025

Auto merge of #148823 - lcnr:generalize-no-subtyping, r=<try>

3d1dd7d

TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize

rustbot added the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 12, 2025

lcnr force-pushed the generalize-no-subtyping branch 2 times, most recently from 84fb939 to 282f7fe Compare November 12, 2025 11:35

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

lcnr force-pushed the generalize-no-subtyping branch from 282f7fe to 929f6e2 Compare November 12, 2025 11:36

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view

rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-perf Status: Waiting on a perf run to be completed. label Nov 12, 2025

lcnr force-pushed the generalize-no-subtyping branch from 8d77bbe to e1be0d2 Compare December 4, 2025 14:44

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Dec 4, 2025

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2025

Auto merge of #148823 - lcnr:generalize-no-subtyping, r=BoxyUwU

22e80cc

TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#250 r? BoxyUwU

bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 5, 2025

bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 5, 2025

bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 6, 2025

bors merged commit b4f1098 into rust-lang:main Dec 6, 2025
12 checks passed

rustbot added this to the 1.94.0 milestone Dec 6, 2025

This was referenced Dec 6, 2025

Forbid freely casting lifetime bounds of dyn-types #136776

Merged

no wf obligations in generalize #148244

Closed

rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Dec 6, 2025

lcnr deleted the generalize-no-subtyping branch December 7, 2025 21:22

lcnr mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2025

subtype obligations drop nested WF obligations required due to bivariant args rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#250

Closed

rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Dec 8, 2025

Uh oh!

TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize #148823

TypeRelating emit WellFormed, not generalize #148823

Uh oh!

Conversation

lcnr commented Nov 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Nov 11, 2025

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Nov 11, 2025

Uh oh!

lcnr commented Nov 11, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented Nov 11, 2025

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Uh oh!

lcnr commented Nov 12, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Uh oh!

This comment has been minimized.

rust-timer commented Nov 12, 2025

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Uh oh!

rustbot commented Dec 4, 2025

Uh oh!

lcnr commented Dec 4, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 4, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

rust-log-analyzer commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

matthiaskrgr commented Dec 5, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 6, 2025

Uh oh!

bors commented Dec 6, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Dec 6, 2025

Test differences

Stage 1

Stage 2

Job duration changes

Uh oh!

rust-timer commented Dec 6, 2025

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Uh oh!

panstromek commented Dec 8, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants

lcnr commented Nov 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading