Make asm label blocks safe context

compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/check_unsafety.rs

@@ -541,8 +541,45 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> Visitor<'a, 'tcx> for UnsafetyVisitor<'a, 'tcx> {
                     self.requires_unsafe(expr.span, DerefOfRawPointer);
                 }
             }
-            ExprKind::InlineAsm { .. } => {
+            ExprKind::InlineAsm(box InlineAsmExpr {
+                asm_macro: _,
+                ref operands,
+                template: _,
+                options: _,
+                line_spans: _,
+            }) => {
                 self.requires_unsafe(expr.span, UseOfInlineAssembly);
+
+                // For inline asm, do not use `walk_expr`, since we want to handle the label block
+                // specially.
+                for op in &**operands {
+                    use rustc_middle::thir::InlineAsmOperand::*;
+                    match op {
+                        In { expr, reg: _ }
+                        | Out { expr: Some(expr), reg: _, late: _ }
+                        | InOut { expr, reg: _, late: _ } => self.visit_expr(&self.thir()[*expr]),
+                        SplitInOut { in_expr, out_expr, reg: _, late: _ } => {
+                            self.visit_expr(&self.thir()[*in_expr]);
+                            if let Some(out_expr) = out_expr {
+                                self.visit_expr(&self.thir()[*out_expr]);
+                            }
+                        }
+                        Out { expr: None, reg: _, late: _ }
+                        | Const { value: _, span: _ }
+                        | SymFn { value: _, span: _ }
+                        | SymStatic { def_id: _ } => {}
+                        Label { block } => {
+                            // Label blocks are safe context.
+                            // `asm!()` is forced to be wrapped inside unsafe. If there's no special
+                            // treatment, the label blocks would also always be unsafe with no way
+                            // of opting out.
+                            self.in_safety_context(SafetyContext::Safe, |this| {
+                                visit::walk_block(this, &this.thir()[*block])
+                            });
+                        }
+                    }
+                }
+                return;
             }
             ExprKind::Adt(box AdtExpr {
                 adt_def,

src/doc/unstable-book/src/language-features/asm-goto.md

@@ -21,7 +21,9 @@ unsafe {
 }
 ```
 
-The block must have unit type or diverge.
+The block must have unit type or diverge. The block starts a new safety context,
+so despite outer `unsafe`, you need extra unsafe to perform unsafe operations
+within `label <block>`.
 
 When `label <block>` is used together with `noreturn` option, it means that the
 assembly will not fallthrough. It's allowed to jump to a label within the

tests/ui/asm/x86_64/goto-block-safe.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+//@ only-x86_64
+//@ needs-asm-support
+
+#![deny(unreachable_code)]
+#![feature(asm_goto)]
+
+use std::arch::asm;
+
+fn goto_fallthough() {
+    unsafe {
+        asm!(
+            "/* {} */",
+            label {
+                core::hint::unreachable_unchecked();
+                //~^ ERROR [E0133]
+            }
+        )
+    }
+}
+
+fn main() {
+    goto_fallthough();
+}

tests/ui/asm/x86_64/goto-block-safe.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+error[E0133]: call to unsafe function `unreachable_unchecked` is unsafe and requires unsafe function or block
+  --> $DIR/goto-block-safe.rs:14:17
+   |
+LL |     unsafe {
+   |     ------ items do not inherit unsafety from separate enclosing items
+...
+LL |                 core::hint::unreachable_unchecked();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ call to unsafe function
+   |
+   = note: consult the function's documentation for information on how to avoid undefined behavior
+
+error: aborting due to 1 previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0133`.