Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 6 pull requests #131540

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

Rollup of 6 pull requests #131540

merged 12 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

alexcrichton and others added 12 commits October 9, 2024 13:21
This pulls in a bug fix relative to the 0.5.9 release which was
updated-to recently.
When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this
makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed.

(The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as
the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but
it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps,
and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)
…-ld, r=jieyouxu

Update wasm-component-ld to 0.5.10

This pulls in a bug fix relative to the 0.5.9 release which was updated-to recently.
coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in `.cov-map` dumps

When making changes that have a large impact on coverage counter creation, this makes it easier to see whether the number of physical counters has changed.

(The highest counter ID seen in coverage maps is not necessarily the same as the number of physical counters actually used by the instrumented code, but it's the best approximation we can get from looking only at the coverage maps, and it should be reasonably accurate in most cases.)

Extracted from rust-lang#131398, since I'm still considering whether to make those changes as-is, whereas this PR is useful and good on its own.
Add myself to bootstrap review rotation

r? `@onur-ozkan`
Consider outermost const-anon in `non_local_def` lint

This PR change the logic for finding the parent of the `impl` definition in the `non_local_definitions` lint to consider multiple level of const-anon items, instead of only one currently.

I also took the opportunity to cleanup the related code.

cc ``@traviscross``
Fixes rust-lang#131474
Fixing rustDoc for LayoutError.

I started reading the the std lib from start to finish and noticed that this rustdoc comment wasn't correct.
…TheVoid

rustdoc-json-types: fix typo in comment
@rustbot rustbot added A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Oct 11, 2024
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=6

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2024

📌 Commit d590d21 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 11, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2024

⌛ Testing commit d590d21 with merge 484c8e7...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 11, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 484c8e7 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 11, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 484c8e7 into rust-lang:master Oct 11, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Oct 11, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR# Message Perf Build Sha
#131464 Update wasm-component-ld to 0.5.10 32572d8d715e3f8d63391a35d999ecd2a2d74efd (link)
#131476 coverage: Include the highest counter ID seen in .cov-map a3ee590a28108dcda71e20fd87171615917df915 (link)
#131497 Add myself to bootstrap review rotation eb8537de99750345bccae1e6d956b1c2be04e7d6 (link)
#131498 Consider outermost const-anon in non_local_def lint 4a821c581f5be997515b332cb9074d715e3eac40 (link)
#131512 Fixing rustDoc for LayoutError. cb7d5b378ef8d2235cb94c9c00b45dfbc160bf32 (link)
#131529 rustdoc-json-types: fix typo in comment 5d7b61e63756944f25aad4c73f49864376f4ea0a (link)

previous master: ce697f919d

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (484c8e7): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.8% [1.8%, 1.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.7% [-2.7%, -2.7%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 1.1%, secondary 0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.0% [2.3%, 3.7%] 2
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.9% [1.7%, 2.0%] 2
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.4% [-3.4%, -3.4%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.1% [-2.8%, 3.7%] 3

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 781.776s -> 780.481s (-0.17%)
Artifact size: 332.13 MiB -> 332.12 MiB (-0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-meta Area: Issues & PRs about the rust-lang/rust repository itself A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants