Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove blank issue template #131228

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jdonszelmann
Copy link
Contributor

r? @Noratrieb

So there are currently two blank issue templates. One called "Blank Issue" and one called "Blank issue". Wildly different, of course. It seems that one is auto generated by GitHub, while the other one has an explicit template for it. This removes the explicit one so there's only one "Blank [iI]ssue" in the list. Unfortunately, the only way to test if it works is merging this and finding out, but it seems obvious that it would work.

image

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Oct 4, 2024
@m-ou-se
Copy link
Member

m-ou-se commented Oct 4, 2024

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 4, 2024

📌 Commit eefe320 has been approved by m-ou-se

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Oct 4, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 4, 2024

⌛ Testing commit eefe320 with merge 3002af6...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 4, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: m-ou-se
Pushing 3002af6 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Oct 4, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 3002af6 into rust-lang:master Oct 4, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Oct 4, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (3002af6): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 1.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
2.7% [2.0%, 4.1%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-4.3% [-4.3%, -4.3%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.0% [-3.0%, -3.0%] 2
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 772.334s -> 772.86s (0.07%)
Artifact size: 342.01 MiB -> 342.03 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants