Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GCC backend subtree update #130948

Merged
merged 66 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024
Merged

GCC backend subtree update #130948

merged 66 commits into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

We just finished the last sync so time to sync back.

cc @antoyo

sapir and others added 30 commits August 5, 2024 00:37
Replace stack_var_count and RETURN_VALUE_COUNT with a single counter
Remove dummy value locals for function ptr calls
From LLVM 15.0.0-rc3. This adds support for COFF archives containing
Arm64EC object files and has various fixes for AIX big archive files.
The previous commit updated `rustfmt.toml` appropriately. This commit is
the outcome of running `x fmt --all` with the new formatting options.
The `weak-intrinsics` feature was removed from compiler_builtins in
rust-lang/compiler-builtins#598, so dropped the
`compiler-builtins-weak-intrinsics` feature from alloc/std/sysroot.

In rust-lang/compiler-builtins#593, some
builtins for f16/f128 were added. These don't work for all compiler
backends, so add a `compiler-builtins-no-f16-f128` feature and disable
it for cranelift and gcc. Also disable it for LLVM targets that don't
support it.
Co-authored-by: Antoni Boucher <[email protected]>
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 27, 2024

r? @chenyukang

rustbot has assigned @chenyukang.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 27, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 27, 2024

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo, @GuillaumeGomez

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 27, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

📌 Commit d0102fd has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 27, 2024
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

Almost forgot:

@bors rollup=never

@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

And also a little priority because it's very conflict prone...

@bors p=1

@saethlin
Copy link
Member

I don't trust that nobody will push a rollup ahead of this.
@bors p=21

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2024

⌛ Testing commit d0102fd with merge b6576e3...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: GuillaumeGomez
Pushing b6576e3 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Sep 28, 2024
@bors bors merged commit b6576e3 into rust-lang:master Sep 28, 2024
8 of 13 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 28, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (b6576e3): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.2% [1.2%, 1.2%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-3.3% [-3.3%, -3.3%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.1% [-3.3%, 1.2%] 2

Cycles

Results (secondary 3.5%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.5% [3.3%, 3.6%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 774.905s -> 774.209s (-0.09%)
Artifact size: 341.40 MiB -> 341.42 MiB (0.00%)

@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the subtree-update branch September 28, 2024 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.