Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rustdoc-json-types: update ProcMacro docs section on helper attributes #130939

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 28, 2024

Conversation

obi1kenobi
Copy link
Member

I believe the mention of attribute macros in the section on proc macro helper attributes is erroneous. As far as I can tell, attribute macros cannot define helper attributes.

The following attribute macro is not valid (fails to build), no matter how I try to define (or skip defining) the helpers:

#[proc_macro_attribute(attributes(helper))]
pub fn attribute_helpers(_attr: TokenStream, item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
    item
}

The language reference also doesn't seem to mention attribute macro helpers. The helpers subsection is inside the section on derive macros.

I believe the mention of attribute macros in the section on proc macro helper attributes is erroneous. As far as I can tell, attribute macros cannot define helper attributes.

The following attribute macro is not valid (fails to build), no matter how I try to define (or skip defining) the helpers:
```rust
#[proc_macro_attribute(attributes(helper))]
pub fn attribute_helpers(_attr: TokenStream, item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
    item
}
```

The [language reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/procedural-macros.html#attribute-macros) also doesn't seem to mention attribute macro helpers. The helpers subsection is inside the section on derive macros.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 27, 2024

r? @notriddle

rustbot has assigned @notriddle.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 27, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Sep 27, 2024

rustdoc-json-types is a public (although nightly-only) API. If possible, consider changing src/librustdoc/json/conversions.rs; otherwise, make sure you bump the FORMAT_VERSION constant.

cc @CraftSpider, @aDotInTheVoid, @Enselic, @obi1kenobi

@obi1kenobi
Copy link
Member Author

I considered bumping the FORMAT_VERSION but it seemed not worth it over a simple docs change. All user-observable behaviors other than "what does docs.rs show" remain the same.

@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

I'm not very familiar with rustdoc-json, and don't feel comfortable reviewing these in general (though this particular change seems harmless).

r? @aDotInTheVoid

@rustbot rustbot assigned aDotInTheVoid and unassigned notriddle Sep 27, 2024
@aDotInTheVoid
Copy link
Member

I considered bumping the FORMAT_VERSION but it seemed not worth it over a simple docs change.

This is correct, the “rule” (that should be written down 😔) is that it needs to be bumped when for changes that would cause deserialisation to fail.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

📌 Commit 3b9db47 has been approved by aDotInTheVoid

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 27, 2024

🌲 The tree is currently closed for pull requests below priority 100. This pull request will be tested once the tree is reopened.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 27, 2024
@aDotInTheVoid aDotInTheVoid changed the title rustdoc: update ProcMacro docs section on helper attributes rustdoc-json-types: update ProcMacro docs section on helper attributes Sep 28, 2024
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#125404 (Fix `read_buf` uses in `std`)
 - rust-lang#130866 (Allow instantiating object trait binder when upcasting)
 - rust-lang#130922 (Reference UNSPECIFIED instead of INADDR_ANY in join_multicast_v4)
 - rust-lang#130924 (Make clashing_extern_declarations considering generic args for ADT field)
 - rust-lang#130939 (rustdoc: update `ProcMacro` docs section on helper attributes)
 - rust-lang#130940 (Revert space-saving operations)
 - rust-lang#130944 (Allow instantiating trait object binder in ptr-to-ptr casts)
 - rust-lang#130953 (Rename a few tests to make tidy happier)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7e32221 into rust-lang:master Sep 28, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.83.0 milestone Sep 28, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#130939 - obi1kenobi:patch-2, r=aDotInTheVoid

rustdoc: update `ProcMacro` docs section on helper attributes

I believe the mention of attribute macros in the section on proc macro helper attributes is erroneous. As far as I can tell, attribute macros cannot define helper attributes.

The following attribute macro is not valid (fails to build), no matter how I try to define (or skip defining) the helpers:
```rust
#[proc_macro_attribute(attributes(helper))]
pub fn attribute_helpers(_attr: TokenStream, item: TokenStream) -> TokenStream {
    item
}
```

The [language reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/procedural-macros.html#attribute-macros) also doesn't seem to mention attribute macro helpers. The helpers subsection is inside the section on derive macros.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-rustdoc-json Area: Rustdoc JSON backend S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants