Make supertrait and implied predicates queries defaulted

[compiler-errors]

r? @ghost only last commit is meaningful

[rustbot]

HIR ty lowering was modified

cc @fmease

Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy

cc @rust-lang/clippy

[compiler-errors]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[compiler-errors]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit cb8ae18 with merge 8a34173...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: 8a34173 (8a34173c9d86540d27bf4c3075daf1e9cdc79831)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (8a34173): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please fix the regressions and do another perf run. If the next run shows neutral or positive results, the label will be automatically removed.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf +perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	7.1%	[7.1%, 7.1%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-1.0%, -0.2%]	20
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.4%	[-0.6%, -0.2%]	15
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-1.0%, -0.2%]	20

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary 2.1%, secondary -2.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.9%	[1.2%, 6.5%]	2
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.3%	[-1.3%, -1.3%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.6%	[-2.6%, -2.6%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	2.1%	[-1.3%, 6.5%]	3

Cycles

Results (secondary 1.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	5.0%	[5.0%, 5.0%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-1.8%	[-1.8%, -1.8%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary -0.0%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	0.2%	[0.0%, 0.7%]	57
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.0%	[0.0%, 0.0%]	3
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-0.9%, -0.0%]	33
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	6
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.9%, 0.7%]	90

Bootstrap: 791.88s -> 790.028s (-0.23%)
Artifact size: 338.70 MiB -> 338.76 MiB (0.02%)

[compiler-errors]

@bors try @rust-timer queue

[bors]

⌛ Trying commit 42d2d78 with merge fdade6c...

[bors]

☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions
Build commit: fdade6c (fdade6c88ada87324da7857fd1448889f9a5d417)

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (fdade6c): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf.

@bors rollup=never
@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-perf -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	1.5%	[1.5%, 1.5%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.3%	[-3.5%, -3.2%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -3.4%, secondary -0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.5%	[2.3%, 2.7%]	2
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-3.4%	[-3.4%, -3.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-2.9%, -2.5%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-3.4%	[-3.4%, -3.4%]	1

Cycles

Results (primary -1.9%, secondary -3.6%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-1.9%, -1.9%]	1
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.6%	[-3.7%, -3.5%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-1.9%, -1.9%]	1

Binary size

Results (primary -0.3%, secondary -0.1%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-1.7%, -0.0%]	67
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.0%]	7
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.3%	[-1.7%, -0.0%]	67

Bootstrap: 751.345s -> 750.732s (-0.08%)
Artifact size: 340.69 MiB -> 340.69 MiB (0.00%)

[compiler-errors]

some crate metadata size improvements :)

r? compiler

[lqd]

(and deep-vector's being noisy)

[petrochenkov]

@bors r+ rollup=maybe

[bors]

📌 Commit 42d2d78 has been approved by petrochenkov

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[lqd]

drive-by q: was this comment inaccurate maybe?

[compiler-errors]

It was. I changed it when I made associated type bounds be implied in supertrait position. I don't have the PR but you could look.