-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add a comment explaining the return type of Ty::kind
.
#129110
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Aug 14, 2024
@bors rollup |
jieyouxu
approved these changes
Aug 15, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Comment on lines
+973
to
+976
// It would be nicer if this returned the value instead of a reference, | ||
// like how `Predicate::kind` and `Region::kind` do. (It would result in | ||
// many fewer subsequent dereferences.) But that gives a small but | ||
// noticeable performance hit. See #126069 for details. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remark: this give me
// Increment counter here if you tried and failed this too:
// let hours_wasted = 10;
vibes, which I find amusing.
r? jieyouxu |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Aug 15, 2024
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…, r=jieyouxu Add a comment explaining the return type of `Ty::kind`. At least we'll get a useful comment out of rust-lang#126069 :) r? `@lcnr`
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…, r=jieyouxu Add a comment explaining the return type of `Ty::kind`. At least we'll get a useful comment out of rust-lang#126069 :) r? ``@lcnr``
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…, r=jieyouxu Add a comment explaining the return type of `Ty::kind`. At least we'll get a useful comment out of rust-lang#126069 :) r? ```@lcnr```
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128064 (Improve docs for Waker::noop and LocalWaker::noop) - rust-lang#128922 (rust-analyzer: use in-tree `pattern_analysis` crate) - rust-lang#128965 (Remove `print::Pat` from the printing of `WitnessPat`) - rust-lang#128977 (Only try to modify file times of a writable file on Windows) - rust-lang#129018 (Migrate `rlib-format-packed-bundled-libs` and `native-link-modifier-bundle` `run-make` tests to rmake) - rust-lang#129037 (Port `run-make/libtest-json` and `run-make/libtest-junit` to rmake) - rust-lang#129078 (`ParamEnvAnd::fully_perform`: we have an `ocx`, use it) - rust-lang#129110 (Add a comment explaining the return type of `Ty::kind`.) - rust-lang#129111 (Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake) - rust-lang#129135 (crashes: more tests) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
…kingjubilee Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#128064 (Improve docs for Waker::noop and LocalWaker::noop) - rust-lang#128922 (rust-analyzer: use in-tree `pattern_analysis` crate) - rust-lang#128965 (Remove `print::Pat` from the printing of `WitnessPat`) - rust-lang#129018 (Migrate `rlib-format-packed-bundled-libs` and `native-link-modifier-bundle` `run-make` tests to rmake) - rust-lang#129037 (Port `run-make/libtest-json` and `run-make/libtest-junit` to rmake) - rust-lang#129078 (`ParamEnvAnd::fully_perform`: we have an `ocx`, use it) - rust-lang#129110 (Add a comment explaining the return type of `Ty::kind`.) - rust-lang#129111 (Port the `sysroot-crates-are-unstable` Python script to rmake) - rust-lang#129135 (crashes: more tests) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#129110 - nnethercote:Ty-kind-ret-ty-comment, r=jieyouxu Add a comment explaining the return type of `Ty::kind`. At least we'll get a useful comment out of rust-lang#126069 :) r? ````@lcnr````
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At least we'll get a useful comment out of #126069 :)
r? @lcnr