Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use a proper probe for shadowing impl #124844

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 14, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/traits/solve/inspect.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -153,6 +153,8 @@ pub enum ProbeKind<'tcx> {
/// do a probe to find out what projection type(s) may be used to prove that
/// the source type upholds all of the target type's object bounds.
UpcastProjectionCompatibility,
/// Looking for param-env candidates that satisfy the trait ref for a projection.
ShadowedEnvProbing,
/// Try to unify an opaque type with an existing key in the storage.
OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result: QueryResult<'tcx> },
}
3 changes: 3 additions & 0 deletions compiler/rustc_middle/src/traits/solve/inspect/format.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -118,6 +118,9 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ProofTreeFormatter<'a, 'b> {
ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { source, result } => {
write!(self.f, "CANDIDATE {source:?}: {result:?}")
}
ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => {
write!(self.f, "PROBING FOR IMPLS SHADOWED BY PARAM-ENV CANDIDATE:")
}
}?;

self.nested(|this| {
Expand Down
19 changes: 8 additions & 11 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/assembly/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
//! Code shared by trait and projection goals for candidate assembly.

use crate::solve::GoalSource;
use crate::solve::{inspect, EvalCtxt, SolverMode};
use crate::solve::{EvalCtxt, SolverMode};
use rustc_hir::def_id::DefId;
use rustc_infer::traits::query::NoSolution;
use rustc_middle::bug;
Expand All @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::{fast_reject, TypeFoldable};
use rustc_middle::ty::{ToPredicate, TypeVisitableExt};
use rustc_span::{ErrorGuaranteed, DUMMY_SP};
use std::fmt::Debug;
use std::mem;

pub(super) mod structural_traits;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -792,17 +791,16 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
goal: Goal<'tcx, G>,
candidates: &mut Vec<Candidate<'tcx>>,
) {
// HACK: We temporarily remove the `ProofTreeBuilder` to
// avoid adding `Trait` candidates to the candidates used
// to prove the current goal.
let inspect = mem::replace(&mut self.inspect, inspect::ProofTreeBuilder::new_noop());

let tcx = self.tcx();
let trait_goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::TraitPredicate<'tcx>> =
goal.with(tcx, goal.predicate.trait_ref(tcx));
let mut trait_candidates_from_env = Vec::new();
self.assemble_param_env_candidates(trait_goal, &mut trait_candidates_from_env);
self.assemble_alias_bound_candidates(trait_goal, &mut trait_candidates_from_env);

let mut trait_candidates_from_env = vec![];
self.probe(|_| ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing).enter(|ecx| {
ecx.assemble_param_env_candidates(trait_goal, &mut trait_candidates_from_env);
ecx.assemble_alias_bound_candidates(trait_goal, &mut trait_candidates_from_env);
});

if !trait_candidates_from_env.is_empty() {
let trait_env_result = self.merge_candidates(trait_candidates_from_env);
match trait_env_result.unwrap().value.certainty {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -831,7 +829,6 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
}
}
}
self.inspect = inspect;
}

/// If there are multiple ways to prove a trait or projection goal, we have
Expand Down
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/select.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -176,7 +176,8 @@ fn to_selection<'tcx>(
| ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly
| ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
| ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { result: _ }
| ProbeKind::Root { result: _ } => {
| ProbeKind::Root { result: _ }
| ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => {
span_bug!(span, "didn't expect to assemble trait candidate from {:#?}", cand.kind())
}
})
Expand Down
34 changes: 24 additions & 10 deletions compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/inspect/analyse.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,8 +18,8 @@ use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{inspect, QueryResult};
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{Certainty, Goal};
use rustc_middle::traits::ObligationCause;
use rustc_middle::ty;
use rustc_middle::ty::TypeFoldable;
use rustc_middle::{bug, ty};
use rustc_span::{Span, DUMMY_SP};

use crate::solve::eval_ctxt::canonical;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -290,12 +290,25 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
match *step {
inspect::ProbeStep::AddGoal(source, goal) => nested_goals.push((source, goal)),
inspect::ProbeStep::NestedProbe(ref probe) => {
// Nested probes have to prove goals added in their parent
// but do not leak them, so we truncate the added goals
// afterwards.
let num_goals = nested_goals.len();
self.candidates_recur(candidates, nested_goals, probe);
nested_goals.truncate(num_goals);
match probe.kind {
// These never assemble candidates for the goal we're trying to solve.
inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
| inspect::ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => continue,

inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::Root { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::TryNormalizeNonRigid { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::TraitCandidate { .. }
| inspect::ProbeKind::OpaqueTypeStorageLookup { .. } => {
// Nested probes have to prove goals added in their parent
// but do not leak them, so we truncate the added goals
// afterwards.
let num_goals = nested_goals.len();
self.candidates_recur(candidates, nested_goals, probe);
nested_goals.truncate(num_goals);
}
}
}
inspect::ProbeStep::MakeCanonicalResponse { shallow_certainty: c } => {
assert_eq!(shallow_certainty.replace(c), None);
Expand All @@ -308,9 +321,10 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InspectGoal<'a, 'tcx> {
}

match probe.kind {
inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly
| inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility => (),
inspect::ProbeKind::UpcastProjectionCompatibility
| inspect::ProbeKind::ShadowedEnvProbing => bug!(),

inspect::ProbeKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly | inspect::ProbeKind::UnsizeAssembly => {}

// We add a candidate even for the root evaluation if there
// is only one way to prove a given goal, e.g. for `WellFormed`.
Expand Down
Loading