Rename StmtKind::Local variant into StmtKind::Let
#122487
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
Changes to the size of AST and/or HIR nodes. cc @nnethercote Some changes occurred in src/tools/clippy cc @rust-lang/clippy |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
GuillaumeGomez
force-pushed
the
rename-stmtkind-local
branch
from
064313f to
ac1b857
Compare
|
Some changes occurred in src/tools/rustfmt cc @rust-lang/rustfmt |
|
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 14, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117118 ([AIX] Remove AixLinker's debuginfo() implementation) - rust-lang#121650 (change std::process to drop supplementary groups based on CAP_SETGID) - rust-lang#121764 (Make incremental sessions identity no longer depend on the crate names provided by source code) - rust-lang#122212 (Copy byval argument to alloca if alignment is insufficient) - rust-lang#122322 (coverage: Initial support for branch coverage instrumentation) - rust-lang#122373 (Fix the conflict problem between the diagnostics fixes of lint `unnecessary_qualification` and `unused_imports`) - rust-lang#122479 (Implement `Duration::as_millis_{f64,f32}`) - rust-lang#122487 (Rename `StmtKind::Local` variant into `StmtKind::Let`) - rust-lang#122498 (Update version of cc crate) - rust-lang#122503 (Make `SubdiagMessageOp` well-formed) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 10 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#117118 ([AIX] Remove AixLinker's debuginfo() implementation) - rust-lang#121650 (change std::process to drop supplementary groups based on CAP_SETGID) - rust-lang#121764 (Make incremental sessions identity no longer depend on the crate names provided by source code) - rust-lang#122212 (Copy byval argument to alloca if alignment is insufficient) - rust-lang#122322 (coverage: Initial support for branch coverage instrumentation) - rust-lang#122373 (Fix the conflict problem between the diagnostics fixes of lint `unnecessary_qualification` and `unused_imports`) - rust-lang#122479 (Implement `Duration::as_millis_{f64,f32}`) - rust-lang#122487 (Rename `StmtKind::Local` variant into `StmtKind::Let`) - rust-lang#122498 (Update version of cc crate) - rust-lang#122503 (Make `SubdiagMessageOp` well-formed) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122487 - GuillaumeGomez:rename-stmtkind-local, r=oli-obk Rename `StmtKind::Local` variant into `StmtKind::Let` It comes from this [discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Improve.20naming.20of.20.60ExprKind.3A.3ALet.60.3F). Starting point was: > I often end up looking at [ExprKind::Let](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/enum.ExprKind.html#variant.Let) instead of Local because of the name. I think renaming it (both the `ExprKind` variant and the Let struct) to `LetPattern` or LetPat could improve the situation as I'm not sure I'm not the only one encountering this issue. And then it evolved into: > It's already `Expr::Let` instead of `StmtKind::Local`. Counterproposal: rename `StmtKind::Local` to `StmtKind::Let`. The goal here is to clear this confusion. r? `@oli-obk`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It comes from this discussion.
Starting point was:
And then it evolved into:
The goal here is to clear this confusion.
r? @oli-obk