-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cleanup: remove zero-offset GEP #122051
Merged
Merged
cleanup: remove zero-offset GEP #122051
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This always produces zero offset, regardless of what the struct layout is. Originally, this may have been necessary in order to change the pointer type, but with opaque pointers, it is no longer necessary.
r? @Nadrieril rustbot has assigned @Nadrieril. Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Mar 6, 2024
erikdesjardins
changed the title
cleanup: remove all-zero GEP
cleanup: remove zero-offset GEP
Mar 6, 2024
@bors r+ |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Mar 6, 2024
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2024
cleanup: remove zero-offset GEP This GEP would've been used to change the pointer type in the past, but after opaque pointers it's a no-op. I missed removing this in rust-lang#105545. Split out from rust-lang#121577.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#113518 (bootstrap/libtest: print test name eagerly on failure even with `verbose-tests=false` / `--quiet`) - rust-lang#117199 (Change the documented implicit value of `-C instrument-coverage` to `=yes`) - rust-lang#121190 (avoid overlapping privacy suggestion for single nested imports) - rust-lang#121382 (Rework `untranslatable_diagnostic` lint) - rust-lang#121833 (Suggest correct path in include_bytes!) - rust-lang#121959 (Removing absolute path in proc-macro) - rust-lang#122038 (Fix linting paths with qself in `unused_qualifications`) - rust-lang#122051 (cleanup: remove zero-offset GEP) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2024
…iaskrgr Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#113518 (bootstrap/libtest: print test name eagerly on failure even with `verbose-tests=false` / `--quiet`) - rust-lang#117199 (Change the documented implicit value of `-C instrument-coverage` to `=yes`) - rust-lang#121190 (avoid overlapping privacy suggestion for single nested imports) - rust-lang#121382 (Rework `untranslatable_diagnostic` lint) - rust-lang#121959 (Removing absolute path in proc-macro) - rust-lang#122038 (Fix linting paths with qself in `unused_qualifications`) - rust-lang#122051 (cleanup: remove zero-offset GEP) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 6, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#122051 - erikdesjardins:cleanup, r=nikic cleanup: remove zero-offset GEP This GEP would've been used to change the pointer type in the past, but after opaque pointers it's a no-op. I missed removing this in rust-lang#105545. Split out from rust-lang#121577.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This GEP would've been used to change the pointer type in the past, but after opaque pointers it's a no-op. I missed removing this in #105545.
Split out from #121577.