Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 12 pull requests #120519

Closed
wants to merge 38 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Nadrieril
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

devnexen and others added 30 commits January 27, 2024 19:14
following-up 5d3d347 commit, rust started to spin
__cxa_thread_call_dtors warnings even without any TLS usage.
using instead home made TLS destructor handler `register_dtor_fallback`.

close rust-lang#120413
Prevents terminal spam.
The test was using an internal feature which doesn't really matter, but
more importantly, we're now fatally exiting after the duplicate lang
item, so this tests nothing.
When encountering

```rust
fn f<T>(a: T, b: T) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
    a.cmp(&b) //~ ERROR E0599
}
```

output

```
error[E0599]: no method named `cmp` found for type parameter `T` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/method-on-unbounded-type-param.rs:2:7
   |
LL | fn f<T>(a: T, b: T) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
   |      - method `cmp` not found for this type parameter
LL |     a.cmp(&b)
   |       ^^^ method cannot be called on `T` due to unsatisfied trait bounds
   |
   = help: items from traits can only be used if the type parameter is bounded by the trait
help: the following traits define an item `cmp`, perhaps you need to restrict type parameter `T` with one of them:
   |
LL | fn f<T: Ord>(a: T, b: T) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
   |       +++++
LL | fn f<T: Iterator>(a: T, b: T) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
   |       ++++++++++
```

Fix rust-lang#120186.
…assoc types

```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `[i32]` cannot be known at compilation time
   --> f100.rs:2:33
    |
2   |     let _ = std::mem::size_of::<[i32]>();
    |                                 ^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
    |
    = help: the trait `Sized` is not implemented for `[i32]`
note: required by an implicit `Sized` bound in `std::mem::size_of`
   --> /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/core/src/mem/mod.rs:312:22
    |
312 | pub const fn size_of<T>() -> usize {
    |                      ^ required by the implicit `Sized` requirement on this bound in `size_of`
```

Fix rust-lang#120178.
Given the previous change to add implicit `Sized` bounds only if there
isn't already an explicit `Sized` bound, now the incr comp machinery
doesn't consider adding the explicit bound as being dirty, as long as
`-Zincremental-ignore-spans` is set.
Ignoring unused bindings should be a determination made by a human, `rustfix` shouldn't auto-apply the suggested change.

Fix rust-lang#54196.
`Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics,
has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints.
This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it
doesn't seem necessary any more.

This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed
output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't
exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in
src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this
error:
```
error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait
  --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13
   |
LL |             fn foo() {}
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
note: existing `foo` defined here
  --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9
   |
LL |         impl T1 for S {}
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
and with this change we also get this error:
```
error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait
  --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13
   |
LL |             fn foo() {}
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
note: existing `foo` defined here
  --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9
   |
LL |         impl T2 for S {}
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even
preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar.
check `RUST_BOOTSTRAP_CONFIG` in `profile_user_dist` test

Fixes a logical bug in `profile_user_dist` test (explained in rust-lang#120202).
…rrors

pattern_analysis: cleanup the contexts

This cleans up a bit the various `*Ctxt`s I had left lying around. As a bonus this made it possible to make `PatternColumn` public. I don't have a use for that yet but that could come useful.

`UsefulnessCtxt` looks useless right now but I'll be adding a field or two in subsequent PRs.

r? ```@compiler-errors```
On E0277 be clearer about implicit `Sized` bounds on type params and assoc types

```
error[E0277]: the size for values of type `[i32]` cannot be known at compilation time
   --> f100.rs:2:33
    |
2   |     let _ = std::mem::size_of::<[i32]>();
    |                                 ^^^^^ doesn't have a size known at compile-time
    |
    = help: the trait `Sized` is not implemented for `[i32]`
note: required by an implicit `Sized` bound in `std::mem::size_of`
   --> /home/gh-estebank/rust/library/core/src/mem/mod.rs:312:22
    |
312 | pub const fn size_of<T>() -> usize {
    |                      ^ required by the implicit `Sized` requirement on this bound in `size_of`
```

Fix rust-lang#120178.
document `FromIterator for Vec` allocation behaviors

[t-libs discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/259402-t-libs.2Fmeetings/topic/Meeting.202024-01-24/near/417686526) about rust-lang#120091 didn't reach a strong consensus, but it was agreed that if we keep the current behavior it should at least be documented even though it is an implementation detail.

The language is intentionally non-committal. The previous (non-existent) documentation permits a lot of implementation leeway and we want retain that. In some cases we even must retain it to be able to rip out some code paths that rely on unstable features.
…param, r=nnethercote

Account for unbounded type param receiver in suggestions

When encountering

```rust
fn f<T>(a: T, b: T) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
    a.cmp(&b) //~ ERROR E0599
}
```

output

```
error[E0599]: no method named `cmp` found for type parameter `T` in the current scope
  --> $DIR/method-on-unbounded-type-param.rs:2:7
   |
LL | fn f<T>(a: T, b: T) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
   |      - method `cmp` not found for this type parameter
LL |     a.cmp(&b)
   |       ^^^ method cannot be called on `T` due to unsatisfied trait bounds
   |
   = help: items from traits can only be used if the type parameter is bounded by the trait
help: the following traits define an item `cmp`, perhaps you need to restrict type parameter `T` with one of them:
   |
LL | fn f<T: Ord>(a: T, b: T) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
   |       +++++
LL | fn f<T: Iterator>(a: T, b: T) -> std::cmp::Ordering {
   |       ++++++++++
```

Fix rust-lang#120186.
std: thread_local::register_dtor fix proposal for FreeBSD.

following-up 5d3d347 commit, rust started to spin
__cxa_thread_call_dtors warnings even without any TLS usage. using instead home made TLS destructor handler `register_dtor_fallback`.

close rust-lang#120413
…ame, r=Urgau,Nilstrieb

Suggest name value cfg when only value is used for check-cfg

Fixes rust-lang#120427
r? ```@Nilstrieb```
…rrors

Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect

Ignoring unused bindings should be a determination made by a human, `rustfix` shouldn't auto-apply the suggested change.

Fix rust-lang#54196.
Make duplicate lang items fatal

Prevents terminal spam.
…estebank

Don't hash lints differently to non-lints.

`Diagnostic::keys`, which is used for hashing and equating diagnostics, has a surprising behaviour: it ignores children, but only for lints. This was added in rust-lang#88493 to fix some duplicated diagnostics, but it doesn't seem necessary any more.

This commit removes the special case and only four tests have changed output, with additional errors. And those additional errors aren't exact duplicates, they're just similar. For example, in src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/same_name_method.rs we currently have this error:
```
error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait
  --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13
   |
LL |             fn foo() {}
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
note: existing `foo` defined here
  --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:79:9
   |
LL |         impl T1 for S {}
   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
and with this change we also get this error:
```
error: method's name is the same as an existing method in a trait
  --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:75:13
   |
LL |             fn foo() {}
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^
   |
note: existing `foo` defined here
  --> $DIR/same_name_method.rs:81:9
   |
LL |         impl T2 for S {}
   |
```
I think printing this second argument is reasonable, possibly even preferable to hiding it. And the other cases are similar.

r? `@estebank`
…oli-obk

Remove the `abi_amdgpu_kernel` feature

The tracking issue (rust-lang#51575) has been closed for 3 years, with no activity for 5.
…merge-bugfix, r=notriddle

rustdoc: Correctly handle attribute merge if this is a glob reexport

Fixes rust-lang#120487.

The regression was introduced in rust-lang#113091. Only non-glob reexports should have been impacted.

cc ```@Nemo157```
r? ```@notriddle```
@rustbot rustbot added O-unix Operating system: Unix-like S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Jan 31, 2024
@Nadrieril
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 31, 2024

📌 Commit f93dbfc has been approved by Nadrieril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 31, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 31, 2024

⌛ Testing commit f93dbfc with merge 6eac264...

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 31, 2024
Rollup of 12 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120207 (check `RUST_BOOTSTRAP_CONFIG` in `profile_user_dist` test)
 - rust-lang#120321 (pattern_analysis: cleanup the contexts)
 - rust-lang#120323 (On E0277 be clearer about implicit `Sized` bounds on type params and assoc types)
 - rust-lang#120355 (document `FromIterator for Vec` allocation behaviors)
 - rust-lang#120396 (Account for unbounded type param receiver in suggestions)
 - rust-lang#120430 (std: thread_local::register_dtor fix proposal for FreeBSD.)
 - rust-lang#120435 (Suggest name value cfg when only value is used for check-cfg)
 - rust-lang#120470 (Mark "unused binding" suggestion as maybe incorrect)
 - rust-lang#120472 (Make duplicate lang items fatal)
 - rust-lang#120490 (Don't hash lints differently to non-lints.)
 - rust-lang#120495 (Remove the `abi_amdgpu_kernel` feature)
 - rust-lang#120501 (rustdoc: Correctly handle attribute merge if this is a glob reexport)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#120346 (hir: Refactor getters for owner nodes)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job x86_64-gnu-aux failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 31, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Jan 31, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 31, 2024

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #120346) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Nadrieril Nadrieril closed this Jan 31, 2024
@Nadrieril Nadrieril deleted the rollup-fup0akd branch January 31, 2024 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
O-unix Operating system: Unix-like rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.