Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 4 pull requests #118820

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

anforowicz and others added 15 commits December 8, 2023 19:42
The new flag has been described in the Major Change Proposal at
rust-lang/compiler-team#656
The test expectations don't apply to WASM, where the target spec
has a different default value of `default_hidden_visibility`.
See the test comments for more details.
…ty, r=TaKO8Ki

Add unstable `-Zdefault-hidden-visibility` cmdline flag for `rustc`.

The new flag has been described in the Major Change Proposal at
rust-lang/compiler-team#656
…rtialEq, r=compiler-errors

Restore `const PartialEq`

And thus fixes a number of tests. There is a bug that still needs to be fixed, so WIP for now.

r? `@compiler-errors`
…KO8Ki

Remove edition umbrella features.

In the 2018 edition, there was an "umbrella" feature `#[feature(rust_2018_preview)]` which was used to enable several other features at once. This umbrella mechanism was not used in the 2021 edition and likely will not be used in 2024 either. During 2018 users reported that setting the feature was awkward, especially since they already needed to opt-in via the edition mechanism.

This PR removes this mechanism because I believe it will not be used (and will clean up and simplify the code). I believe that there are better ways to handle features and editions. In short:

- For highly experimental features, that may or may not be involved in an edition, they can implement regular feature gates like `tcx.features().my_feature`.
- For experimental features that *might* be involved in an edition, they should implement gates with `tcx.features().my_feature && span.at_least_rust_20xx()`. This requires the user to still specify `#![feature(my_feature)]`, to avoid disrupting testing of other edition features which are ready and have been accepted within the edition.
- For experimental features that have graduated to definitely be part of an edition, they should implement gates with `tcx.features().my_feature || span.at_least_rust_20xx()`, or just remove the feature check altogether and just check `span.at_least_rust_20xx()`.
- For relatively simple changes, they can skip the whole feature gating thing and just check `span.at_least_rust_20xx()`, and rely on the instability of the edition itself (which requires `-Zunstable-options`) to gate it.

I am working on documenting all of this in the rustc-dev-guide.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 11, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ p=4 rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 11, 2023

📌 Commit 003bb06 has been approved by GuillaumeGomez

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 11, 2023
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the rollup-0xls0ax branch December 11, 2023 10:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants