-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[stable] Prepare 1.74.0 release #117843
Merged
Merged
[stable] Prepare 1.74.0 release #117843
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot
added
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-infra
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-release
Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
labels
Nov 12, 2023
the fix on nightly is recent and should get time to bake, removal of the optimization is the less risky approach for a backport
This method is trying to detect macro invocations, so that it can split a span into two parts just after the `!` of the invocation. Under some circumstances (probably involving nested macros), it gets confused and produces a span that is larger than the original span, and possibly extends outside its enclosing function and even into an adjacent file. In extreme cases, that can result in malformed coverage mappings that cause `llvm-cov` to fail. For now, we at least want to detect these egregious cases and avoid them, so that coverage reports can still be produced.
Without the workaround applied, this test will produce malformed mappings that cause `llvm-cov` to fail. (And if it does emit well-formed mappings, they should be obviously incorrect.)
Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
@bors r+ rollup=never p=10 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Nov 13, 2023
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
This was referenced Nov 17, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite
Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc
merged-by-bors
This PR was explicitly merged by bors.
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
T-infra
Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-release
Relevant to the release subteam, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#promote-branches-t-3-days-monday
Also backports:
io::copy(_, Vec<u8>)
specialization #117576"r? @Mark-Simulacrum