-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Rollup of 6 pull requests #116480
Closed
Closed
Rollup of 6 pull requests #116480
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Clarify that `ManuallyDrop<T>` has the same bit validity as `T`.
The `unfold` function have since been renamed to `from_fn`.
…tions, r=workingjubilee `waitqueue` clarifications for SGX platform The documentation of `waitqueue` functions on the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` platform is incorrect at some places and on others missing. This PR improves upon this. cc: `@jethrogb`
Clarify example in docs of str::char_slice Just a one word improvement. “Last” can be misread as meaning the last (third) instead of the previous (first).
Clarify ManuallyDrop bit validity Clarify that `ManuallyDrop<T>` has the same bit validity as `T`.
…ttmcm Fix a comment in std::iter::successors The `unfold` function have since rust-lang#58062 been renamed to `from_fn`. (I'm not sure if this whole comment is still useful—it's not like there are many iterators that *can't* be based on `from_fn`. Anyway, in its current form this comment is not correct, and it sent me into a half-hour research of what happened to `unfold` function, so I want to do *something* with it 🙃 deleting these three lines is a perfectly fine alternative, in my opinion.)
update some comments around swap() Based on `@eddyb's` comment [here](rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines#461 (comment)). And then I noticed the wrong capitalization for Miri and fixed it in some other places as well.
…l, r=GuillaumeGomez rustdoc-search: fix bug with multi-item impl trait Preview searches: - https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-5/compiler-doc-impl-trait-bugfix/index.html?search=-%3E%20globalctxt - https://notriddle.com/rustdoc-html-demo-5/compiler-doc-impl-trait-bugfix/index.html?search=globalctxt
rustbot
added
O-SGX
Target: SGX
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
labels
Oct 6, 2023
@bors r+ rollup=never p=6 |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 6, 2023
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2023
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#111595 (`waitqueue` clarifications for SGX platform) - rust-lang#115454 (Clarify example in docs of str::char_slice) - rust-lang#115522 (Clarify ManuallyDrop bit validity) - rust-lang#115588 (Fix a comment in std::iter::successors) - rust-lang#116329 (update some comments around swap()) - rust-lang#116475 (rustdoc-search: fix bug with multi-item impl trait) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Oct 6, 2023
@bors retry |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
and removed
S-waiting-on-review
Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
labels
Oct 6, 2023
@bors r- |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
and removed
S-waiting-on-bors
Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
labels
Oct 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
O-SGX
Target: SGX
rollup
A PR which is a rollup
S-waiting-on-author
Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author.
T-compiler
Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-libs
Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
T-rustdoc
Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Successful merges:
waitqueue
clarifications for SGX platform #111595 (waitqueue
clarifications for SGX platform)r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup
Create a similar rollup