Lint node for PRIVATE_BOUNDS/PRIVATE_INTERFACES is the item which names the private type
#115633
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
PRIVATE_BOUNDS-lint-node
branch
from
4706d13 to
f15e7d8
Compare
|
cc @Bryanskiy |
petrochenkov
reviewed
Sep 7, 2023
|
r=me with the improvement from #115633 (comment). |
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-author
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
PRIVATE_BOUNDS-lint-node
branch
from
f15e7d8 to
14e59bb
Compare
|
@bors r=petrochenkov |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
…t-node, r=petrochenkov Lint node for `PRIVATE_BOUNDS`/`PRIVATE_INTERFACES` is the item which names the private type The HIR that the `PRIVATE_BOUNDS` lint should be attached to is the item that has the *bounds*, not the private type. This PR also aligns this behavior with the `EXPORTED_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCIES` lint, which also requires putting the `allow` on the item that names the private type. Fixes rust-lang#115475 r? petrochenkov
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
…t-node, r=petrochenkov Lint node for `PRIVATE_BOUNDS`/`PRIVATE_INTERFACES` is the item which names the private type The HIR that the `PRIVATE_BOUNDS` lint should be attached to is the item that has the *bounds*, not the private type. This PR also aligns this behavior with the `EXPORTED_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCIES` lint, which also requires putting the `allow` on the item that names the private type. Fixes rust-lang#115475 r? petrochenkov
GuillaumeGomez
added a commit
to GuillaumeGomez/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
…t-node, r=petrochenkov Lint node for `PRIVATE_BOUNDS`/`PRIVATE_INTERFACES` is the item which names the private type The HIR that the `PRIVATE_BOUNDS` lint should be attached to is the item that has the *bounds*, not the private type. This PR also aligns this behavior with the `EXPORTED_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCIES` lint, which also requires putting the `allow` on the item that names the private type. Fixes rust-lang#115475 r? petrochenkov
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 7, 2023
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#115345 (MCP661: Move wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads target to Tier 2) - rust-lang#115604 (rustdoc: Render private fields in tuple struct as `/* private fields */`) - rust-lang#115624 (Print the path of a return-position impl trait in trait when `return_type_notation` is enabled) - rust-lang#115629 (Don't suggest dereferencing to unsized type) - rust-lang#115633 (Lint node for `PRIVATE_BOUNDS`/`PRIVATE_INTERFACES` is the item which names the private type) - rust-lang#115634 (Use `newtype_index` for `IntVid` and `FloatVid`.) - rust-lang#115638 (`-Cllvm-args` usability improvement) - rust-lang#115649 (diagnostics: add test case for trait bounds diagnostic) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#115345 (MCP661: Move wasm32-wasi-preview1-threads target to Tier 2) - rust-lang#115604 (rustdoc: Render private fields in tuple struct as `/* private fields */`) - rust-lang#115624 (Print the path of a return-position impl trait in trait when `return_type_notation` is enabled) - rust-lang#115629 (Don't suggest dereferencing to unsized type) - rust-lang#115633 (Lint node for `PRIVATE_BOUNDS`/`PRIVATE_INTERFACES` is the item which names the private type) - rust-lang#115634 (Use `newtype_index` for `IntVid` and `FloatVid`.) - rust-lang#115638 (`-Cllvm-args` usability improvement) - rust-lang#115649 (diagnostics: add test case for trait bounds diagnostic) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
…llaumeGomez Rollup of 6 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#104299 (Clarify stability guarantee for lifetimes in enum discriminants) - rust-lang#115088 (Fix Step Skipping Caused by Using the `--exclude` Option) - rust-lang#115201 (rustdoc: list matching impls on type aliases) - rust-lang#115633 (Lint node for `PRIVATE_BOUNDS`/`PRIVATE_INTERFACES` is the item which names the private type) - rust-lang#115638 (`-Cllvm-args` usability improvement) - rust-lang#115643 (fix: return early when has tainted in mir-lint) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 8, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#115633 - compiler-errors:PRIVATE_BOUNDS-lint-node, r=petrochenkov Lint node for `PRIVATE_BOUNDS`/`PRIVATE_INTERFACES` is the item which names the private type The HIR that the `PRIVATE_BOUNDS` lint should be attached to is the item that has the *bounds*, not the private type. This PR also aligns this behavior with the `EXPORTED_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCIES` lint, which also requires putting the `allow` on the item that names the private type. Fixes rust-lang#115475 r? petrochenkov
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The HIR that the
PRIVATE_BOUNDSlint should be attached to is the item that has the bounds, not the private type. This PR also aligns this behavior with theEXPORTED_PRIVATE_DEPENDENCIESlint, which also requires putting theallowon the item that names the private type.Fixes #115475
r? petrochenkov