Skip to content

Conversation

@kpreid
Copy link
Contributor

@kpreid kpreid commented Aug 18, 2023

This patch was sitting around in my drafts. I don't recall the motivation, but I think it was someone expressing confusion over “will likely abort” (since, in fact, a panicking drop not caused by dropping while panicking will predictably not abort).

I hope that the new text will leave people well-informed about why not to panic and when it is reasonable to panic.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 18, 2023

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 18, 2023
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

Seems OK.

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 26, 2023

📌 Commit 2bccf1e has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 26, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 27, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 2bccf1e with merge f320f42...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 27, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing f320f42 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Aug 27, 2023
@bors bors merged commit f320f42 into rust-lang:master Aug 27, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.74.0 milestone Aug 27, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (f320f42): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.4% [4.4%, 4.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-2.3% [-4.2%, -1.3%] 3
All ❌✅ (primary) 3.5% [3.5%, 3.5%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 631.022s -> 631.802s (0.12%)
Artifact size: 316.05 MiB -> 316.10 MiB (0.01%)

@kpreid kpreid deleted the dropdoc branch August 29, 2023 19:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants