Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rollup of 9 pull requests #110458

Merged
merged 23 commits into from
Apr 17, 2023
Merged

Rollup of 9 pull requests #110458

merged 23 commits into from
Apr 17, 2023

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

Successful merges:

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

AndyJado and others added 23 commits April 13, 2023 09:43
This setting is false by default according to rustc code here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_session/src/options.rs#L1236

I tested on a project and confirmed that setting this to false has no
effect, the linker flag still appears. Setting it to true removes the
linker flag.
I suspect this macro was around before `TypeFoldable`/`TypeVisitable`
were derivable. But now it's only used for two types, `Result` and
`Option`. Removing the macro and implementing the traits for those types
by hand makes the code much simpler.
They both allow for a lifetime other than `'tcx`, but this isn't needed.
Nothing particularly exciting here, but a couple of things I noticed as I was looking for more index conversions to simplify.
The above-mentioned change modified the output of thread-local.rs by
changing some variable names. Rather than assume things get put in %0,
we capture the variable so the test passes in both the old and new
version.
Migrate diagnostics in `rustc_borrowck`

sorry for making a new PR, [rust-lang#103559](rust-lang#103559) and [rust-lang#103960](rust-lang#103960).

I am crawling, joyfully.
…code-like-that-anyway, r=oli-obk

fix false positives for `unused_parens` around unary and binary operations

fix rust-lang#110251
…d, r=WaffleLapkin

allow `repr(align = x)` on inherent methods

Discussion: rust-lang#82232 (comment)
Correct default value for default-linker-libraries

This setting is false by default according to rustc code here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/compiler/rustc_session/src/options.rs#L1236

I tested on a project and confirmed the behavior described. First, with no value, the `-nodefaultlibs` linker flag is present. Setting this to false has no effect, as well. The linker flag still appears. Setting it to true removes the linker flag as expected.
…ros, r=lcnr

Clean up traversal macros

The declarative macros relating to type folding and visiting can be simplified.

r? ``@lcnr``
Various minor Idx-related tweaks

Nothing particularly exciting here, but a couple of things I noticed as I was looking for more index conversions to simplify.

cc rust-lang/compiler-team#606
r? `@WaffleLapkin`
…ram, r=petrochenkov

Encode def span for `ConstParam`

Fixes rust-lang#110206

r? ``@petrochenkov``
…i-obk

Check freeze with right param-env in `deduced_param_attrs`

We're checking if a trait (`Freeze`) holds in a polymorphic function, but not using that function's own (reveal-all) param-env. This causes us to try to eagerly normalize a specializable projection type that has no default value, which causes an ICE.

Fixes rust-lang#110171
tests: adapt for LLVM change 5b386b8

The above-mentioned change modified the output of thread-local.rs by changing some variable names. Rather than assume things get put in %0, we capture the variable so the test passes in both the old and new version.
@rustbot rustbot added A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Apr 17, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=9

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 17, 2023

📌 Commit c81e8b8 has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 17, 2023
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 17, 2023

⌛ Testing commit c81e8b8 with merge 31656e7...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 17, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing 31656e7 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Apr 17, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 31656e7 into rust-lang:master Apr 17, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 17, 2023
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (31656e7): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - ACTION NEEDED

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.2% [1.2%, 1.2%] 3
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.1% [-2.9%, -0.3%] 12
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.5% [-7.7%, -0.2%] 11
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.1% [-2.9%, -0.3%] 12

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.8% [-2.8%, -2.8%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Apr 17, 2023
@nnethercote
Copy link
Contributor

I think this is all noise: keccak, cranelift-codegen and diesel have just started being noisy.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. label Apr 18, 2023
@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr deleted the rollup-1xcxmgc branch March 16, 2024 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-query-system Area: The rustc query system (https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/query.html) merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. perf-regression-triaged The performance regression has been triaged. rollup A PR which is a rollup S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. WG-trait-system-refactor The Rustc Trait System Refactor Initiative
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.