Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Figure out testing strategy for pr 108996 #109131

Conversation

pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

this is just a test PR for me to try to figure out whether this run-make test will trigger things on the CI for PR #108996

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 14, 2023

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Mar 14, 2023
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot label: -S-waiting-on-review +S-waiting-on-author

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 14, 2023
… my current run-make test works to catch failure in CI.
@rustbot rustbot added A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Mar 14, 2023
@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member Author

@rustbot try

@pnkfelix pnkfelix closed this Mar 14, 2023
@pnkfelix pnkfelix reopened this Mar 14, 2023
@pnkfelix pnkfelix closed this Mar 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants