Fix the sanitizer_scs_attr_check.rs test #102724
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The test is failing when targeting aarch64 Android. The intent appears to have been to look for a function attributes comment (or the absence of one) on the line preceding the function declaration. But this isn't quite possible with FileCheck and the test as written was looking for a line with `no_scs` after a line with `scs`, which doesn't appear in the output. Instead, match on the function attributes comment on the line following the demangled function name comment.
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
cc @chriswailes |
|
@bors r+ rollup=iffy |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
|
Finished benchmarking commit (3655784): comparison URL. Overall result: ✅ improvements - no action needed@rustbot label: -perf-regression Instruction countThis is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Max RSS (memory usage)ResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResultsThis is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Footnotes |
Aaron1011
pushed a commit
to Aaron1011/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 6, 2023
Fix the sanitizer_scs_attr_check.rs test The test is failing when targeting aarch64 Android. The intent appears to have been to look for a function attributes comment (or the absence of one) on the line preceding the function declaration. But this isn't quite possible with FileCheck and the test as written was looking for a line with `no_scs` after a line with `scs`, which doesn't appear in the output. Instead, match on the function attributes comment on the line following the demangled function name comment.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The test is failing when targeting aarch64 Android. The intent appears to have been to look for a function attributes comment (or the absence of one) on the line preceding the function declaration. But this isn't quite possible with FileCheck and the test as written was looking for a line with
no_scsafter a line withscs, which doesn't appear in the output. Instead, match on the function attributes comment on the line following the demangled function name comment.