Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Suggest pub instead of public for const type item #101668

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2022

Conversation

chenyukang
Copy link
Member

@chenyukang chenyukang commented Sep 11, 2022

Fixes #101626

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Sep 11, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @TaKO8Ki

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 11, 2022
@Rageking8
Copy link
Contributor

Is the missing # in front of the issue number this fixes intentional?

@chenyukang
Copy link
Member Author

Is the missing # in front of the issue number this fixes intentional?

no, just forget it, updated it now.

Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bors r+ rollup

@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

TaKO8Ki commented Sep 12, 2022

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2022

📌 Commit 975dd6c has been approved by TaKO8Ki

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 12, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 975dd6c with merge 8e74e92f826d7089a16a6d591d2c8ddc7208e7d6...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 12, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Sep 12, 2022
@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors retry

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 12, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2022
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#100293 (Add inline-llvm option for disabling/enabling LLVM inlining)
 - rust-lang#100767 (Remove manual <[u8]>::escape_ascii)
 - rust-lang#101668 (Suggest pub instead of public for const type item)
 - rust-lang#101671 (Fix naming format of IEEE 754 standard)
 - rust-lang#101676 (Check that the types in return position `impl Trait` in traits are well-formed)
 - rust-lang#101681 (Deny return-position `impl Trait` in traits for object safety)
 - rust-lang#101693 (Update browser UI test 0 10)
 - rust-lang#101701 (Rustdoc-Json: Add tests for trait impls.)
 - rust-lang#101706 (rustdoc: remove no-op `#search`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit d7bad03 into rust-lang:master Sep 12, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Sep 12, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Edge case does not suggest changing invalid public with pub
8 participants