Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait #100019

Conversation

TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki commented Aug 1, 2022

The suggestion implemented in #75608 was not working properly, so I fixed it.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 1, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @oli-obk

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 1, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki changed the title Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait [WIP] Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait Aug 1, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki marked this pull request as draft August 1, 2022 09:48
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki changed the title [WIP] Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait Aug 1, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2022 11:26
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 1, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100024) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki force-pushed the suggest-boxed-trait-objects-instead-of-impl-trait branch from 719a1a1 to d90a715 Compare August 2, 2022 02:54
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 7, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #100213) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki force-pushed the suggest-boxed-trait-objects-instead-of-impl-trait branch from d90a715 to 82f2c08 Compare August 7, 2022 07:50
@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Aug 7, 2022

r? @rust-lang/wg-diagnostics

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@TaKO8Ki it has only been 6 days since you've submitted this PR, so please wait a bit longer before requesting a new reviewer 😅

@TaKO8Ki
Copy link
Member Author

TaKO8Ki commented Aug 7, 2022

@compiler-errors I had a conflict and requested a review, but as you said, I'll wait a little longer.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

r? is to get a new reviewer, not to signal that the PR is ready for a review. But since I already am notified for this, I can take a look later today after a flight.

r? @compiler-errors

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Looks good!

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Aug 7, 2022

📌 Commit 82f2c08 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 7, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#100019 (Revive suggestions for boxed trait objects instead of impl Trait)
 - rust-lang#100038 (Document the `no-std` target option in config.toml.example)
 - rust-lang#100194 (Remove even more box syntax uses from src/test)
 - rust-lang#100206 (test: skip terminfo parsing in Miri)
 - rust-lang#100230 (Use start_point instead of next_point to point to elided lifetime amp…)
 - rust-lang#100244 (Add armv4t-none-eabi take2)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 7be359e into rust-lang:master Aug 8, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 8, 2022
@TaKO8Ki TaKO8Ki deleted the suggest-boxed-trait-objects-instead-of-impl-trait branch August 8, 2022 08:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants