-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error on constant pointer dereference #6991
Labels
E-needs-test
Call for participation: An issue has been fixed and does not reproduce, but no test has been added.
I-ICE
Issue: The compiler panicked, giving an Internal Compilation Error (ICE) ❄️
Comments
Especially with |
Triage: still a bug; dereferencing in constant expressions does seem a little peculiar. |
Defining the semantics of constant expressions continues to be something we really should tackle. See also #5551. |
Triage bump, carry on. |
steveklabnik
added
the
I-ICE
Issue: The compiler panicked, giving an Internal Compilation Error (ICE) ❄️
label
Sep 22, 2014
No longer valid. |
Flagging as needstest |
alexcrichton
added
the
E-needs-test
Call for participation: An issue has been fixed and does not reproduce, but no test has been added.
label
Oct 11, 2014
ghost
mentioned this issue
Oct 25, 2014
flip1995
pushed a commit
to flip1995/rust
that referenced
this issue
Apr 8, 2021
redundant_pattern_matching: look inside Refs look inside refs and detect if let &None = ... Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#5396 changelog: redundant_pattern_matching: look inside Refs to fix FNs with "if let &None = .. "
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
E-needs-test
Call for participation: An issue has been fixed and does not reproduce, but no test has been added.
I-ICE
Issue: The compiler panicked, giving an Internal Compilation Error (ICE) ❄️
After #6990 lands the following fails with an error message. (It currently ICEs.)
I'm not sure whether this is correctly not-constant, or whether it should compile fine. In the former case, is this something that should be handled in
check_const.rs
rather thanconst_eval.rs
(where it is handled currently (0d0c004))?That testcase requires the
match
with they
.(This is filed because I wasn't sure about whether this is a valid testcase for #6990 or whether it shouldn't be triggering this code path at all.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: