Abstract the version number in the Rust codebase #3306
Comments
|
What would be the best way to do this? I can't think of a nice way that doesn't involve having two copies of the source tree. |
|
There's no language mechanism that exists yet to make this possible and it may not be worth applying a preprocessor to all our source code just to do this. |
|
If macros supported literals this could be solved using: |
|
Closing as a dupe of #5642. The other one has links to another bug, and it's been nominated (otherwise they're pretty much the same). |
bors
pushed a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this issue
May 15, 2021
Do not force trailing comma when using mixed layout
jaisnan
added a commit
to jaisnan/rust-dev
that referenced
this issue
Jul 29, 2024
…#3306) Adds support for f16 and f128, i.e 1. adding translation to `irep` . 2. generating arbitrary values for the new types 3. generating basic invariants (checking if safe) for new types 4. Adds sanity testing for arbitrary on the new types. Resolves rust-lang#3303
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The version number is repeated many times in the Rust repo, in Makefile.in, in rust linkage and use directives, and in the docs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: