-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BTreeMap/Set should specify iteration is ordered #31129
Labels
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
Comments
part of #29348 |
mbrubeck
added a commit
to mbrubeck/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 22, 2016
Also change the examples to make this more obvious. Fixes rust-lang#31129.
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2016
Also change the examples to make this more obvious. Fixes rust-lang#31129.
steveklabnik
added a commit
to steveklabnik/rust
that referenced
this issue
Jan 23, 2016
Also change the examples to make this more obvious. Fixes rust-lang#31129.
This is not actually closed, as the |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
E-easy
Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.
I just wanted to note that it is nowhere mentioned that all iterators from there are in sorted order. While I have to admit that it makes sense for a ordered container to provide ordered iterators, it is not documented. In the examples it is assumed that the iterators are ordered, but nowhere explictly stated.
Neither in the BTreeMap nor the BTreeSet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: