Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Overhaul the #[cfg(..)] pattern syntax #17490

Closed
alexcrichton opened this issue Sep 23, 2014 · 3 comments · Fixed by #17630
Closed

Overhaul the #[cfg(..)] pattern syntax #17490

alexcrichton opened this issue Sep 23, 2014 · 3 comments · Fixed by #17630
Assignees
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
Milestone

Comments

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

Tracking issue for rust-lang/rfcs#194.

Nominating as the changes are backwards-incompatible.

@alexcrichton alexcrichton added I-nominated B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented. labels Sep 23, 2014
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

Assigning to @sfackler who has volunteered to implement.

@pnkfelix
Copy link
Member

1.0, P-backcompat-lang.

@pnkfelix pnkfelix added this to the 1.0 milestone Sep 25, 2014
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 27, 2014
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 28, 2014
We'll need a snapshot before we can convert the codebase over and turn on the deprecation warnings.

cc #17490

This is sitting on top of #17506
@pcwalton
Copy link
Contributor

Blocked on a snapshot.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
B-RFC-approved Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants