Auto merge of #84244 - ABouttefeux:closure-return-conflict-suggest, r…

…=estebank

fix incomplete diagnostic notes when closure returns conflicting for genric type

fixes #84128
Correctly report the span on for conflicting return type in closures

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/coercion.rs

@@ -1492,28 +1492,6 @@ impl<'tcx, 'exprs, E: AsCoercionSite> CoerceMany<'tcx, 'exprs, E> {
         if let (Some(sp), Some(fn_output)) = (fcx.ret_coercion_span.get(), fn_output) {
             self.add_impl_trait_explanation(&mut err, cause, fcx, expected, sp, fn_output);
         }
-
-        if let Some(sp) = fcx.ret_coercion_span.get() {
-            // If the closure has an explicit return type annotation,
-            // then a type error may occur at the first return expression we
-            // see in the closure (if it conflicts with the declared
-            // return type). Skip adding a note in this case, since it
-            // would be incorrect.
-            if !err.span.primary_spans().iter().any(|&span| span == sp) {
-                let hir = fcx.tcx.hir();
-                let body_owner = hir.body_owned_by(hir.enclosing_body_owner(fcx.body_id));
-                if fcx.tcx.is_closure(hir.body_owner_def_id(body_owner).to_def_id()) {
-                    err.span_note(
-                        sp,
-                        &format!(
-                            "return type inferred to be `{}` here",
-                            fcx.resolve_vars_if_possible(expected)
-                        ),
-                    );
-                }
-            }
-        }
-
         err
     }
 

compiler/rustc_typeck/src/check/demand.rs

@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
         self.suggest_missing_parentheses(err, expr);
         self.note_need_for_fn_pointer(err, expected, expr_ty);
         self.note_internal_mutation_in_method(err, expr, expected, expr_ty);
+        self.report_closure_infered_return_type(err, expected)
     }
 
     // Requires that the two types unify, and prints an error message if
@@ -1061,4 +1062,32 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> FnCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
             _ => false,
         }
     }
+
+    // Report the type inferred by the return statement.
+    fn report_closure_infered_return_type(
+        &self,
+        err: &mut DiagnosticBuilder<'_>,
+        expected: Ty<'tcx>,
+    ) {
+        if let Some(sp) = self.ret_coercion_span.get() {
+            // If the closure has an explicit return type annotation,
+            // then a type error may occur at the first return expression we
+            // see in the closure (if it conflicts with the declared
+            // return type). Skip adding a note in this case, since it
+            // would be incorrect.
+            if !err.span.primary_spans().iter().any(|&span| span == sp) {
+                let hir = self.tcx.hir();
+                let body_owner = hir.body_owned_by(hir.enclosing_body_owner(self.body_id));
+                if self.tcx.is_closure(hir.body_owner_def_id(body_owner).to_def_id()) {
+                    err.span_note(
+                        sp,
+                        &format!(
+                            "return type inferred to be `{}` here",
+                            self.resolve_vars_if_possible(expected)
+                        ),
+                    );
+                }
+            }
+        }
+    }
 }

src/test/ui/closures/issue-84128.rs

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// test for issue 84128
+// missing suggestion for similar ADT type with diffetent generic paramenter
+// on closure ReturnNoExpression
+
+struct Foo<T>(T);
+
+fn main() {
+    || {
+        if false {
+            return Foo(0);
+        }
+
+        Foo(())
+        //~^ ERROR mismatched types [E0308]
+    };
+}

src/test/ui/closures/issue-84128.stderr

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+error[E0308]: mismatched types
+  --> $DIR/issue-84128.rs:13:13
+   |
+LL |         Foo(())
+   |             ^^ expected integer, found `()`
+   |
+note: return type inferred to be `{integer}` here
+  --> $DIR/issue-84128.rs:10:20
+   |
+LL |             return Foo(0);
+   |                    ^^^^^^
+
+error: aborting due to previous error
+
+For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.