Don't lint from_over_into for opaque types
#9982
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
r? @flip1995 (rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
xFrednet
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
flip1995
approved these changes
Nov 29, 2022
Member
flip1995
left a comment
flip1995
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM. r=me after the next sync (in case I forget)
Contributor
Author
|
@bors r=flip1995 |
Contributor
Contributor
Contributor
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #9935
This is stalled until the next sync. The impl in question can't be written on the pinned nightly.
changelog: Don't lint
from_over_intofor opaque types