Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix false positive of implicit_saturating_sub with else clause #7832

Merged

Conversation

narpfel
Copy link
Contributor

@narpfel narpfel commented Oct 17, 2021

Fixes #7831

changelog: Fix false positive of [implicit_saturating_sub] with else clause

@rust-highfive
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @giraffate (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 17, 2021
@giraffate
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

It looks good, thanks!

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2021

📌 Commit a550133 has been approved by giraffate

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2021

⌛ Testing commit a550133 with merge af85240...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 18, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: giraffate
Pushing af85240 to master...

@bors bors merged commit af85240 into rust-lang:master Oct 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

False positive for implicit-saturating-sub with else block
4 participants