Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lintcheck: print stats how lint counts change #6800

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 26, 2021

Conversation

matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@matthiaskrgr matthiaskrgr commented Feb 26, 2021

The stats look like this:

Stats:
clippy::manual_map 0 => 10
clippy::missing_panics_doc 54 => 56
clippy::upper_case_acronyms 18 => 4

changelog: lintcheck: print stats about changing lint counts in the log

In order to check if we need to recheck crates, I was getting the path from clap only
which is None if we don't pass it via cmdline args.

Use the dedicated lintcheck_config_toml() fnuction instead!
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @llogiq

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Feb 26, 2021
@llogiq
Copy link
Contributor

llogiq commented Feb 26, 2021

Good find with the wrong direction of the time comparisons. @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 26, 2021

📌 Commit 90cf27e has been approved by llogiq

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 26, 2021

⌛ Testing commit 90cf27e with merge 6343446...

@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member Author

Heh, I wish this was the first time I made that mistake... 😅

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 26, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: llogiq
Pushing 6343446 to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants