Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add lint for replacing .map().collect() with .try_for_each() #6227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 29, 2020

Conversation

HMPerson1
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #6208

changelog: Add map_collect_result_unit

@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @phansch

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Oct 26, 2020
@phansch
Copy link
Member

phansch commented Oct 29, 2020

LGTM, thanks! @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 29, 2020

📌 Commit f0cf3bd has been approved by phansch

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 29, 2020

⌛ Testing commit f0cf3bd with merge c57d8ae...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Oct 29, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: phansch
Pushing c57d8ae to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Use try_for_each instead of map collect
4 participants