Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bad explicit_into_iter_loop suggestion #4978

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 3, 2020
Merged

Fix bad explicit_into_iter_loop suggestion #4978

merged 1 commit into from Jan 3, 2020

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jan 1, 2020

Fixes #4958

changelog: Fix bad explicit_into_iter_loop suggestion

@JohnTitor JohnTitor added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jan 1, 2020
@phansch
Copy link
Member

phansch commented Jan 3, 2020

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 3, 2020

📌 Commit ea829bd has been approved by phansch

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 3, 2020

⌛ Testing commit ea829bd with merge 304edf3...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 3, 2020
Fix bad `explicit_into_iter_loop` suggestion

Fixes #4958

changelog: Fix bad `explicit_into_iter_loop` suggestion
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 3, 2020

☀️ Test successful - checks-travis, status-appveyor
Approved by: phansch
Pushing 304edf3 to master...

@bors bors merged commit ea829bd into rust-lang:master Jan 3, 2020
@ghost ghost deleted the fix-4958 branch June 24, 2020 04:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Invalid suggestion for explicit_iter_loop, which results in compiler error [trait bounds]
3 participants