Detect integration tests in is_in_test

[ClementTsang]

Related: #13981

This PR makes it so that the is_in_test check accounts for if a node is in an integration test file (that is, under tests/). This should fix the issue where some clippy settings work for cfg(test) but not for integration tests.

This could be extended to benches as well if this seems reasonable.

---

Note that this is the first time I'm contributing to this repo, so please let me know if there's anything to change. I'm not really sure how I was meant to test this for example, especially if I want to test an example of this where it should still "fail", I guess (should I split the integration_test with two crates?).

changelog: [unwrap-used]: allow-unwrap-in-tests works now on integration tests.

[rustbot]

r? @dswij

rustbot has assigned @dswij.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

Why was this reviewer chosen?

The reviewer was selected based on:

• Owners of files modified in this PR: 7 candidates
• 7 candidates expanded to 7 candidates
• Random selection from Jarcho, dswij, llogiq, samueltardieu

[ClementTsang]

Hmmm it looks like it's causing problems because now some of clippy's tests are being treated as valid under is_in_test... let me set this to draft for now and figure this out. For whatever reason I didn't catch this when testing locally earlier.

[rustbot]

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

[blyxyas]

Hello @ClementTsang, I hope that you don't mind we using this contribution to teach @medzernik some things about reviewing (they were very interested!).

cc @medzernik Check out this comment first.

[ClementTsang]

@blyxyas nope, I don't mind!

[medzernik]

r? @medzernik

[medzernik]

I didn't find anything of note.. I guess approve? :D

View changes since this review