Skip to content

Conversation

@profetia
Copy link
Contributor

@profetia profetia commented Jun 16, 2025

Closes #15007

Removes the break stmt and the dead code after it when appropriate.

changelog: [never_loop] Make sure to remove break in suggestions

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jun 16, 2025

r? @Alexendoo

rustbot has assigned @Alexendoo.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jun 16, 2025
@profetia profetia force-pushed the issue15007 branch 3 times, most recently from 4f18d7f to 028a864 Compare June 17, 2025 13:17
@blyxyas
Copy link
Member

blyxyas commented Jul 11, 2025

Alexendoo's a little bit over the top on capacity (32 assigned PRs)
I'll shave off his last uncommented PRs.

r? @blyxyas

@rustbot rustbot assigned blyxyas and unassigned Alexendoo Jul 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@blyxyas blyxyas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Some starting review, mainly on readability.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Jul 14, 2025
@profetia profetia requested a review from blyxyas July 15, 2025 13:43
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) labels Jul 15, 2025
@profetia
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated. Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@blyxyas blyxyas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would be the last question, and I think this is ready!

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties labels Jul 15, 2025
@profetia
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rustbot ready

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action from the author. (Use `@rustbot ready` to update this status) labels Jul 16, 2025
@blyxyas blyxyas added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 20, 2025
Merged via the queue into rust-lang:master with commit 6543a09 Jul 20, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label Jul 20, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2025
Closes #15350

Follow up of #15064

changelog: [`never_loop`] add to remove `break` in nested loop
@profetia profetia deleted the issue15007 branch September 12, 2025 01:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

never_loop should also remove break labels that were inside the loop

4 participants