Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ir: References have no implicit template parameters. #1114

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 28, 2017

Conversation

emilio
Copy link
Contributor

@emilio emilio commented Oct 28, 2017

Fixes #1113.

@highfive
Copy link

warning Warning warning

  • These commits modify unsafe code. Please review it carefully!

@emilio
Copy link
Contributor Author

emilio commented Oct 28, 2017

r? @fitzgen or @pepyakin

Copy link
Contributor

@pepyakin pepyakin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@pepyakin
Copy link
Contributor

@bors-servo r+

@bors-servo
Copy link

📌 Commit 0630f46 has been approved by pepyakin

@bors-servo
Copy link

⌛ Testing commit 0630f46 with merge c7f0fab...

bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2017
ir: References have no implicit template parameters.

Fixes #1113.
@bors-servo
Copy link

☀️ Test successful - status-travis
Approved by: pepyakin
Pushing c7f0fab to master...

@bors-servo bors-servo merged commit 0630f46 into rust-lang:master Oct 28, 2017
emilio added a commit to emilio/rust-bindgen that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2017
Only bugfixes have landed since the last release (rust-lang#1112 and rust-lang#1114), apart from
doc fixes.
@emilio emilio mentioned this pull request Oct 28, 2017
bors-servo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2017
Minor version bump.

Only bugfixes have landed since the last release (#1112 and #1114), apart from
doc fixes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants