Skip to content

Conversation

@davidbarsky
Copy link
Contributor

@Wilfred and I were talking about OpQueue and we identified one symptom of its (relative) weirdness is that last_op_result returns a T::default(); not Option<&T>, which means it's not possible to distinguish between "the OpQueue hasn't run yet" and "the OpQueue ran, but didn't produce a result". This branch fixes that.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 26, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Wilfred Wilfred left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I really like this idea, I think explicitly having a 'OpQueue has never done anything' state is much clearer.

@davidbarsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

The test failures are legitimate, fwiw.

@davidbarsky davidbarsky force-pushed the davidbarsky/push-xkqnsyksmzqv branch from 29c9834 to 0c58839 Compare September 27, 2024 16:12
@davidbarsky
Copy link
Contributor Author

If there are no objections, I'll merge this after Monday's release. This change feels like it has a large blast radius.

@davidbarsky davidbarsky force-pushed the davidbarsky/push-xkqnsyksmzqv branch 2 times, most recently from 0ff9e51 to b66d3ff Compare September 30, 2024 14:11
@davidbarsky davidbarsky force-pushed the davidbarsky/push-xkqnsyksmzqv branch from b66d3ff to fc6eb66 Compare September 30, 2024 14:13
@Veykril
Copy link
Member

Veykril commented Sep 30, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 30, 2024

📌 Commit fc6eb66 has been approved by Veykril

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 30, 2024

⌛ Testing commit fc6eb66 with merge 28830ff...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 30, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Veykril
Pushing 28830ff to master...

@bors bors merged commit 28830ff into rust-lang:master Sep 30, 2024
11 checks passed
@davidbarsky davidbarsky deleted the davidbarsky/push-xkqnsyksmzqv branch September 30, 2024 14:40
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…eykril

internal: switch remaining OpQueues to use named structs

Building atop of #18195, I switched `GlobalState::fetch_build_data_queue` to use a struct instead of a tuple.

(I didn't switch `fetch_proc_macros_queue` to not return a bool, as the return value is only used in one spot.)
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2024
…avidbarsky

internal: switch remaining OpQueues to use named structs

Building atop of #18195, I switched `GlobalState::fetch_build_data_queue` to use a struct instead of a tuple.

(I didn't switch `fetch_proc_macros_queue` to not return a bool, as the return value is only used in one spot.)
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
…rpoq, r=davidbarsky

internal: switch remaining OpQueues to use named structs

Building atop of rust-lang/rust-analyzer#18195, I switched `GlobalState::fetch_build_data_queue` to use a struct instead of a tuple.

(I didn't switch `fetch_proc_macros_queue` to not return a bool, as the return value is only used in one spot.)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants