Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a used attribute #1459

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
62 changes: 62 additions & 0 deletions text/0000-used.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
- Feature Name: preserve
- Start Date: 2016-01-11
- RFC PR: (leave this empty)
- Rust Issue: (leave this empty)

# Summary
[summary]: #summary

Add a `preserve` attribute to prevent symbols from being discarded. This
attribute is similar to GCC's `used` attribute.

# Motivation
[motivation]: #motivation

The compiler cannot always see all references to a symbol. For example, if a
symbol is only referenced from inline assembly, the compiler might think that
the symbol is unused.

If the compiler thinks that a symbol is unused, it might optimize the symbol
away which might change the behavior of the program or cause the linking step to
fail. For example:

```rust
#![allow(dead_code)]

#[link_section = ".init_array"]
static F: extern fn() = f;

extern fn f() {
println!("test");
}

fn main() { }
```

When this program is compiled without optimization, it prints "test". But if it
is compiled with optimization, it prints nothing.

# Detailed design
[design]: #detailed-design

A `#[preserve]` attribute is added. This attribute can be applied to static
variables and functions without type parameters.

If an item is marked with this attribute, the compiler generates the
corresponding symbol and the symbol is not discarded by the compilation process.
It may be discarded by the linking process.

# Drawbacks
[drawbacks]: #drawbacks

None.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that this drawbacks section should probably at least mention that "may be discarded by the linker" can in some cases be confusing. In annotating a symbol as #[preserve] one might expect it to be preserved but it may not make it all the way through.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One might expect that #[inline] inlines the function but that's not true either.


# Alternatives
[alternatives]: #alternatives

None.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think that "no alternatives" may be a bit disingenuous here, you may want to at least mention that there's always at least a minor bikeshed around the naming, but there's also a few possible syntactical forms that this could take.


# Unresolved questions
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions

None.