Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the --build-plan option #7902

Closed

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This commit removes the "build plan" feature from Cargo. More
information can be found in #7614.

This commit removes the "build plan" feature from Cargo. More
information can be found in rust-lang#7614.
@rust-highfive
Copy link

r? @Eh2406

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 18, 2020
@Eh2406
Copy link
Contributor

Eh2406 commented Feb 18, 2020

Looks good when tests are passing.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 20, 2020

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #7820) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Jan 12, 2021

Closing since this has gotten very far out of date, and I suspect will need to be rewritten from scratch. We still need to figure out what to do here, though. 😦

@ehuss ehuss closed this Jan 12, 2021
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2024
Document build-plan as being deprecated

This adds a note to the build-plan documentation that it is deprecated. I do not think it will make any progress as it is. In the future, we should remove the feature (#7902), possibly with a code-warning ahead of time.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants