Auto merge of rust-lang#127906 - tgross35:rollup-41bhgce, r=tgross35

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#127491 (Migrate 8 very similar FFI `run-make` tests to rmake)
 - rust-lang#127687 (Const-to-pattern-to-MIR cleanup)
 - rust-lang#127822 (Migrate `issue-85401-static-mir`, `missing-crate-dependency` and `unstable-flag-required` `run-make` tests to rmake)
 - rust-lang#127842 (Remove `TrailingToken`.)
 - rust-lang#127864 (cleanup: remove support for 3DNow! cpu features)
 - rust-lang#127899 (Mark myself as on leave)
 - rust-lang#127901 (Add missing GHA group for building `llvm-bitcode-linker`)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup

Cargo.lock

@@ -4411,6 +4411,7 @@ dependencies = [
 name = "rustc_mir_build"
 version = "0.0.0"
 dependencies = [
+ "either",
  "itertools",
  "rustc_apfloat",
  "rustc_arena",

compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/constant.rs

@@ -37,13 +37,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
     pub fn eval_unevaluated_mir_constant_to_valtree(
         &self,
         constant: &mir::ConstOperand<'tcx>,
-    ) -> Result<Option<ty::ValTree<'tcx>>, ErrorHandled> {
+    ) -> Result<Result<ty::ValTree<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>>, ErrorHandled> {
         let uv = match self.monomorphize(constant.const_) {
             mir::Const::Unevaluated(uv, _) => uv.shrink(),
             mir::Const::Ty(_, c) => match c.kind() {
                 // A constant that came from a const generic but was then used as an argument to old-style
                 // simd_shuffle (passing as argument instead of as a generic param).
-                rustc_type_ir::ConstKind::Value(_, valtree) => return Ok(Some(valtree)),
+                rustc_type_ir::ConstKind::Value(_, valtree) => return Ok(Ok(valtree)),
                 other => span_bug!(constant.span, "{other:#?}"),
             },
             // We should never encounter `Const::Val` unless MIR opts (like const prop) evaluate
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx, Bx: BuilderMethods<'a, 'tcx>> FunctionCx<'a, 'tcx, Bx> {
         let val = self
             .eval_unevaluated_mir_constant_to_valtree(constant)
             .ok()
+            .map(|x| x.ok())
             .flatten()
             .map(|val| {
                 let field_ty = ty.builtin_index().unwrap();

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/mod.rs

@@ -27,15 +27,15 @@ pub(crate) use valtrees::{eval_to_valtree, valtree_to_const_value};
 // We forbid type-level constants that contain more than `VALTREE_MAX_NODES` nodes.
 const VALTREE_MAX_NODES: usize = 100000;
 
-pub(crate) enum ValTreeCreationError {
+pub(crate) enum ValTreeCreationError<'tcx> {
     NodesOverflow,
     /// Values of this type, or this particular value, are not supported as valtrees.
-    NonSupportedType,
+    NonSupportedType(Ty<'tcx>),
 }
-pub(crate) type ValTreeCreationResult<'tcx> = Result<ty::ValTree<'tcx>, ValTreeCreationError>;
+pub(crate) type ValTreeCreationResult<'tcx> = Result<ty::ValTree<'tcx>, ValTreeCreationError<'tcx>>;
 
-impl From<InterpErrorInfo<'_>> for ValTreeCreationError {
-    fn from(err: InterpErrorInfo<'_>) -> Self {
+impl<'tcx> From<InterpErrorInfo<'tcx>> for ValTreeCreationError<'tcx> {
+    fn from(err: InterpErrorInfo<'tcx>) -> Self {
         ty::tls::with(|tcx| {
             bug!(
                 "Unexpected Undefined Behavior error during valtree construction: {}",

compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/const_eval/valtrees.rs

@@ -120,21 +120,21 @@ fn const_to_valtree_inner<'tcx>(
             // We could allow wide raw pointers where both sides are integers in the future,
             // but for now we reject them.
             if matches!(val.layout.abi, Abi::ScalarPair(..)) {
-                return Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType);
+                return Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType(ty));
             }
             let val = val.to_scalar();
             // We are in the CTFE machine, so ptr-to-int casts will fail.
             // This can only be `Ok` if `val` already is an integer.
             let Ok(val) = val.try_to_scalar_int() else {
-                return Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType);
+                return Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType(ty));
             };
             // It's just a ScalarInt!
             Ok(ty::ValTree::Leaf(val))
         }
 
         // Technically we could allow function pointers (represented as `ty::Instance`), but this is not guaranteed to
         // agree with runtime equality tests.
-        ty::FnPtr(_) => Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType),
+        ty::FnPtr(_) => Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType(ty)),
 
         ty::Ref(_, _, _)  => {
             let derefd_place = ecx.deref_pointer(place)?;
@@ -148,15 +148,15 @@ fn const_to_valtree_inner<'tcx>(
         // resolving their backing type, even if we can do that at const eval time. We may
         // hypothetically be able to allow `dyn StructuralPartialEq` trait objects in the future,
         // but it is unclear if this is useful.
-        ty::Dynamic(..) => Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType),
+        ty::Dynamic(..) => Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType(ty)),
 
         ty::Tuple(elem_tys) => {
             branches(ecx, place, elem_tys.len(), None, num_nodes)
         }
 
         ty::Adt(def, _) => {
             if def.is_union() {
-                return Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType);
+                return Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType(ty));
             } else if def.variants().is_empty() {
                 bug!("uninhabited types should have errored and never gotten converted to valtree")
             }
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ fn const_to_valtree_inner<'tcx>(
         | ty::Closure(..)
         | ty::CoroutineClosure(..)
         | ty::Coroutine(..)
-        | ty::CoroutineWitness(..) => Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType),
+        | ty::CoroutineWitness(..) => Err(ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType(ty)),
     }
 }
 
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ pub(crate) fn eval_to_valtree<'tcx>(
     let valtree_result = const_to_valtree_inner(&ecx, &place, &mut num_nodes);
 
     match valtree_result {
-        Ok(valtree) => Ok(Some(valtree)),
+        Ok(valtree) => Ok(Ok(valtree)),
         Err(err) => {
             let did = cid.instance.def_id();
             let global_const_id = cid.display(tcx);
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ pub(crate) fn eval_to_valtree<'tcx>(
                         tcx.dcx().emit_err(MaxNumNodesInConstErr { span, global_const_id });
                     Err(handled.into())
                 }
-                ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType => Ok(None),
+                ValTreeCreationError::NonSupportedType(ty) => Ok(Err(ty)),
             }
         }
     }

compiler/rustc_error_codes/src/error_codes/E0158.md

@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
-An associated `const`, `const` parameter or `static` has been referenced
-in a pattern.
+A generic parameter or `static` has been referenced in a pattern.
 
 Erroneous code example:
 
@@ -15,25 +14,25 @@ trait Bar {
 
 fn test<A: Bar>(arg: Foo) {
     match arg {
-        A::X => println!("A::X"), // error: E0158: associated consts cannot be
-                                  //        referenced in patterns
+        A::X => println!("A::X"), // error: E0158: constant pattern depends
+                                  //        on a generic parameter
         Foo::Two => println!("Two")
     }
 }
 ```
 
-Associated `const`s cannot be referenced in patterns because it is impossible
+Generic parameters cannot be referenced in patterns because it is impossible
 for the compiler to prove exhaustiveness (that some pattern will always match).
 Take the above example, because Rust does type checking in the *generic*
 method, not the *monomorphized* specific instance. So because `Bar` could have
-theoretically infinite implementations, there's no way to always be sure that
+theoretically arbitrary implementations, there's no way to always be sure that
 `A::X` is `Foo::One`. So this code must be rejected. Even if code can be
 proven exhaustive by a programmer, the compiler cannot currently prove this.
 
-The same holds true of `const` parameters and `static`s.
+The same holds true of `static`s.
 
-If you want to match against an associated `const`, `const` parameter or
-`static` consider using a guard instead:
+If you want to match against a `const` that depends on a generic parameter or a
+`static`, consider using a guard instead:
 
 ```
 trait Trait {

compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/mod.rs

@@ -1427,17 +1427,17 @@ impl<'tcx> InferCtxt<'tcx> {
         span: Span,
     ) -> Result<ty::Const<'tcx>, ErrorHandled> {
         match self.const_eval_resolve(param_env, unevaluated, span) {
-            Ok(Some(val)) => Ok(ty::Const::new_value(
+            Ok(Ok(val)) => Ok(ty::Const::new_value(
                 self.tcx,
                 val,
                 self.tcx.type_of(unevaluated.def).instantiate(self.tcx, unevaluated.args),
             )),
-            Ok(None) => {
+            Ok(Err(bad_ty)) => {
                 let tcx = self.tcx;
                 let def_id = unevaluated.def;
                 span_bug!(
                     tcx.def_span(def_id),
-                    "unable to construct a constant value for the unevaluated constant {:?}",
+                    "unable to construct a valtree for the unevaluated constant {:?}: type {bad_ty} is not valtree-compatible",
                     unevaluated
                 );
             }

compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/error.rs

@@ -90,9 +90,11 @@ TrivialTypeTraversalImpls! { ErrorHandled }
 pub type EvalToAllocationRawResult<'tcx> = Result<ConstAlloc<'tcx>, ErrorHandled>;
 pub type EvalStaticInitializerRawResult<'tcx> = Result<ConstAllocation<'tcx>, ErrorHandled>;
 pub type EvalToConstValueResult<'tcx> = Result<ConstValue<'tcx>, ErrorHandled>;
-/// `Ok(None)` indicates the constant was fine, but the valtree couldn't be constructed.
-/// This is needed in `thir::pattern::lower_inline_const`.
-pub type EvalToValTreeResult<'tcx> = Result<Option<ValTree<'tcx>>, ErrorHandled>;
+/// `Ok(Err(ty))` indicates the constant was fine, but the valtree couldn't be constructed
+/// because the value containts something of type `ty` that is not valtree-compatible.
+/// The caller can then show an appropriate error; the query does not have the
+/// necssary context to give good user-facing errors for this case.
+pub type EvalToValTreeResult<'tcx> = Result<Result<ValTree<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>>, ErrorHandled>;
 
 #[cfg(target_pointer_width = "64")]
 rustc_data_structures::static_assert_size!(InterpErrorInfo<'_>, 8);

compiler/rustc_middle/src/query/erase.rs

@@ -157,9 +157,10 @@ impl EraseType for Result<mir::ConstValue<'_>, mir::interpret::ErrorHandled> {
     type Result = [u8; size_of::<Result<mir::ConstValue<'static>, mir::interpret::ErrorHandled>>()];
 }
 
-impl EraseType for Result<Option<ty::ValTree<'_>>, mir::interpret::ErrorHandled> {
-    type Result =
-        [u8; size_of::<Result<Option<ty::ValTree<'static>>, mir::interpret::ErrorHandled>>()];
+impl EraseType for Result<Result<ty::ValTree<'_>, Ty<'_>>, mir::interpret::ErrorHandled> {
+    type Result = [u8; size_of::<
+        Result<Result<ty::ValTree<'static>, Ty<'static>>, mir::interpret::ErrorHandled>,
+    >()];
 }
 
 impl EraseType for Result<&'_ ty::List<Ty<'_>>, ty::util::AlwaysRequiresDrop> {

compiler/rustc_middle/src/thir.rs

@@ -783,16 +783,13 @@ pub enum PatKind<'tcx> {
     },
 
     /// One of the following:
-    /// * `&str` (represented as a valtree), which will be handled as a string pattern and thus
-    ///   exhaustiveness checking will detect if you use the same string twice in different
-    ///   patterns.
+    /// * `&str`/`&[u8]` (represented as a valtree), which will be handled as a string/slice pattern
+    ///   and thus exhaustiveness checking will detect if you use the same string/slice twice in
+    ///   different patterns.
     /// * integer, bool, char or float (represented as a valtree), which will be handled by
     ///   exhaustiveness to cover exactly its own value, similar to `&str`, but these values are
     ///   much simpler.
-    /// * Opaque constants (represented as `mir::ConstValue`), that must not be matched
-    ///   structurally. So anything that does not derive `PartialEq` and `Eq`.
-    ///
-    /// These are always compared with the matched place using (the semantics of) `PartialEq`.
+    /// * `String`, if `string_deref_patterns` is enabled.
     Constant {
         value: mir::Const<'tcx>,
     },

compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/consts.rs

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 use crate::middle::resolve_bound_vars as rbv;
 use crate::mir::interpret::{ErrorHandled, LitToConstInput, Scalar};
 use crate::ty::{self, GenericArgs, ParamEnv, ParamEnvAnd, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeVisitableExt};
+use either::Either;
 use rustc_data_structures::intern::Interned;
 use rustc_error_messages::MultiSpan;
 use rustc_hir as hir;
@@ -312,14 +313,16 @@ impl<'tcx> Const<'tcx> {
         Self::from_bits(tcx, n as u128, ParamEnv::empty().and(tcx.types.usize))
     }
 
-    /// Returns the evaluated constant
+    /// Returns the evaluated constant as a valtree;
+    /// if that fails due to a valtree-incompatible type, indicate which type that is
+    /// by returning `Err(Left(bad_type))`.
     #[inline]
-    pub fn eval(
+    pub fn eval_valtree(
         self,
         tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
         param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>,
         span: Span,
-    ) -> Result<(Ty<'tcx>, ValTree<'tcx>), ErrorHandled> {
+    ) -> Result<(Ty<'tcx>, ValTree<'tcx>), Either<Ty<'tcx>, ErrorHandled>> {
         assert!(!self.has_escaping_bound_vars(), "escaping vars in {self:?}");
         match self.kind() {
             ConstKind::Unevaluated(unevaluated) => {
@@ -328,27 +331,47 @@ impl<'tcx> Const<'tcx> {
                 let (param_env, unevaluated) = unevaluated.prepare_for_eval(tcx, param_env);
                 // try to resolve e.g. associated constants to their definition on an impl, and then
                 // evaluate the const.
-                let Some(c) = tcx.const_eval_resolve_for_typeck(param_env, unevaluated, span)?
-                else {
-                    // This can happen when we run on ill-typed code.
-                    let e = tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(
-                        span,
-                        "`ty::Const::eval` called on a non-valtree-compatible type",
-                    );
-                    return Err(e.into());
-                };
-                Ok((tcx.type_of(unevaluated.def).instantiate(tcx, unevaluated.args), c))
+                match tcx.const_eval_resolve_for_typeck(param_env, unevaluated, span) {
+                    Ok(Ok(c)) => {
+                        Ok((tcx.type_of(unevaluated.def).instantiate(tcx, unevaluated.args), c))
+                    }
+                    Ok(Err(bad_ty)) => Err(Either::Left(bad_ty)),
+                    Err(err) => Err(Either::Right(err.into())),
+                }
             }
             ConstKind::Value(ty, val) => Ok((ty, val)),
-            ConstKind::Error(g) => Err(g.into()),
+            ConstKind::Error(g) => Err(Either::Right(g.into())),
             ConstKind::Param(_)
             | ConstKind::Infer(_)
             | ConstKind::Bound(_, _)
             | ConstKind::Placeholder(_)
-            | ConstKind::Expr(_) => Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric(span)),
+            | ConstKind::Expr(_) => Err(Either::Right(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric(span))),
         }
     }
 
+    /// Returns the evaluated constant
+    #[inline]
+    pub fn eval(
+        self,
+        tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
+        param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>,
+        span: Span,
+    ) -> Result<(Ty<'tcx>, ValTree<'tcx>), ErrorHandled> {
+        self.eval_valtree(tcx, param_env, span).map_err(|err| {
+            match err {
+                Either::Right(err) => err,
+                Either::Left(_bad_ty) => {
+                    // This can happen when we run on ill-typed code.
+                    let e = tcx.dcx().span_delayed_bug(
+                        span,
+                        "`ty::Const::eval` called on a non-valtree-compatible type",
+                    );
+                    e.into()
+                }
+            }
+        })
+    }
+
     /// Normalizes the constant to a value or an error if possible.
     #[inline]
     pub fn normalize(self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, param_env: ParamEnv<'tcx>) -> Self {

compiler/rustc_mir_build/Cargo.toml

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ edition = "2021"
 
 [dependencies]
 # tidy-alphabetical-start
+either = "1.5.0"
 itertools = "0.12"
 rustc_apfloat = "0.2.0"
 rustc_arena = { path = "../rustc_arena" }

compiler/rustc_mir_build/messages.ftl

@@ -4,8 +4,6 @@ mir_build_already_borrowed = cannot borrow value as mutable because it is also b
 
 mir_build_already_mut_borrowed = cannot borrow value as immutable because it is also borrowed as mutable
 
-mir_build_assoc_const_in_pattern = associated consts cannot be referenced in patterns
-
 mir_build_bindings_with_variant_name =
     pattern binding `{$name}` is named the same as one of the variants of the type `{$ty_path}`
     .suggestion = to match on the variant, qualify the path